Display compact view
United Kingdom-Clydebank: Road construction works
Section I: Contracting authority
Main address: www.dawn-group.co.uk
Address of the buyer profile: https://www.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/search/Search_AuthProfile.aspx?ID=AA29423
Main address: www.gardiner.com
Address of the buyer profile: http://www.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/search/Search_AuthProfile.aspx?ID=AA19123
Section II: Object
Queens Quay, Clydebank — Work Package 201 — Drainage, Utilities and Roadworks.
The works include the following:
1) Construction of spine road;
2) Improvements and alterations to road junctions;
3) Drainage infrastructure;
4) Builderswork associated with utility infrastructure and diversions;
5) Builderswork associated with installation of district heating mains pipework.
Queens Quay, Clydebank, West Dumbartonshire.
Appointment of a work package contractor to carry out works on the Queens Quay site, which extends to approximately 23.0 hectares.
The works covered by this contract notice consists of the following:
1) Construction of the main spine road through the site with an approximate overall length of 1 km.
2) Improvements and alterations to the road junctions at Cart Street and Cable Depot Road. These junctions are on the public highway outwith the site boundary.
3) Drainage infrastructure comprising surface water drainage, foul water drainage, filter trenches and a new pumping station.
4) Coordination of the installation of multi utility services infrastructure comprising electricity, water, gas and telecoms. The multi utility services provider will be appointed and paid separately but will be managed by the work package contractor who will carry out all builderswork required for the multi utility services installation.
5) District heating pipework installation. The district heating pipework contractor will be a nominated sub-contractor who will be appointed through a separate procurement exercise. The work package contractor will be responsible for managing the nominated sub-contractor and will carry out all associated builderswork required for the district heating pipework installation.
Section III: Legal, economic, financial and technical information
Bidders are required to be enrolled in the relevant professional or trade registers within the country in which they are established i.e. companies house.
The Bidder response to these questions for Economic and Financial Standing will be evaluated as follows:
Pass = response is compliant with the minimum requirement stated in the Contract Notice section III.1.2) Economic and financial standing;
Fail = response is not compliant with the minimum requirement stated in the Contract Notice section III.1.2) Economic and financial standing.
4B.1.2 Bidders will be required to have at least an average yearly turnover of 10 000 000 GBP over the past 3 years.
4B.3 In the case that turnover information is not available for the given period please state the date on which the bidder was set up or started trading.
4B.5.1, 4B.5.2 and 4B.5.3. It is a requirement of this contract that bidders hold, or can commit to obtain prior to the commencement of any subsequently awarded contract, the types and levels of insurance indicated below:
Employers Liability — 10 000 000 GBP each and every claim
Public Liability — 10 000 000 GBP each and every claim.
Tenderers to fully answer question 4C.1.
Please provide 3 relevant examples of projects carried out during the last 5 years as specified in the Contract Notice. For the purposes of assessing supplier's responses to this question it is expected that the examples should include:
— Approach taken in order to ensure delivery of the example project on time and to the project specification.
— Approach taken to ensure successful management of sub-contractors and interactions with third parties to ensure effective delivery.
— Identification of any key issues and or technical difficulties that required to be overcome and how these were overcome, identifying any methodologies used and lessons learned.
As part of your response please provide as a minimum the following:
— The name of the client,
— A brief project description and the suppliers role in its delivery,
— Approach taken in delivery of the example project; identifying any lessons learned and methodologies used to overcome key issues,
— Project budget,
— Programme duration,
— Project completion date,
— Name(s) of major sub-contractors and / or specialist sub-contractors,
— Involvement in the road / drainage adoption process.
Examples from both public and/or private sector customers and clients may be provided.
Response to this question should not exceed 2 000 words per example.
Where a submission exceeds the maximum number of words indicated per example, no account will be taken of the words beyond the Maximum Word Count.
For clarity, the word count will begin at the first word in the response (including any headings, titles and references to the section) and no consideration will be given to words after the limit has been exceeded. Note that this count includes all headers, titles and appendices. Figures and diagrams may be used to accompany text but should be restricted to one per section and not unduly use text.
Scoring will be carried out as follows:
0 = No response is provided to the question
20 = Response provided but not acceptable, not relevant or contains minimal information or, where relevant to the nature of the question, unacceptable or minimal experience/skills/resources
40 = Response fails to satisfactorily answer the entire remit of the question or, where relevant to the nature of the question provides limited relevant information or limited experience/skills/resources
60 = Response answers the remit of the question and contains satisfactory information or, where relevant to the nature of the question satisfactory experience/skills/resources but could be enhanced in multiple aspects
80 = Response satisfactorily answers the question and contains good information or, where relevant to the nature of the question, good experience/skills/resources but could be enhanced in a small number of aspects.
100 = Fully detailed response and contains excellent information or, where relevant to the nature of the question excellent experience/skills/resources answering the entire remit of the question.
Terms and conditions relating to this contract will be a single stage contract arrangement utilising the Infrastructure Conditions of Contract (ICC) Measurement Version August 2011 with amendments. Full details of the terms and conditions will be identified at ITT (Invitation to Tender) stage.
Section IV: Procedure
Section VI: Complementary information
Note: To register your interest in this notice and obtain any additional information please visit the Public Contracts Scotland Web Site at http://www.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/Search/Search_Switch.aspx?ID=516138
The buyer has indicated that it will accept electronic responses to this notice via the Postbox facility. A user guide is available at http://www.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/sitehelp/help_guides.aspx
Suppliers are advised to allow adequate time for uploading documents and to dispatch the electronic response well in advance of the closing time to avoid any last minute problems.
A sub-contract clause has been included in this contract. For more information see: http://www.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/info/InfoCentre.aspx?ID=2363
The Contracting Authority does not intend to include any community benefit requirements in this contract for the following reason:
Download the ESPD document here: http://www.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/ESPD/ESPD_Download.aspx?id=516138
Clydeside Regneration Limited will incorporate a minimum 10 day calender day standstill period at the point information on the award of the contract is communicated to tenderers. The Public Contracts (Contracts) Regulations 2015 (as amended) provide for aggrieved parties who have been harmed or are at risk of harm by a breach the rules to take court action. Any such action must be started within 30 days beginning with the date when the aggrieved party first knew or ought to have known that grounds for starting the proceedings had arisen. The Court may extend the time limit for starting proceedings where the Court considers that there is a good reason for doing so but not so as to permit proceedings to be started more than 3 months after that date.
The review of the submitted information will be carried out by Gardiner & Theobald LLP (Quantity Surveyor) in conjunction with Dawn Urban Regeneration Limited (Development Manager), Ryden LLP (Project Manager), Goodson Associates (Civil/Structural Engineer), Ian White Associates (Landscape Architect) and Henderson Warnock (Services Engineer).