5.1.1.
Zweck
Art des Auftrags: Lieferleistungen
Zusätzliche Art des Auftrags: Dienstleistungen
Haupteinstufung (cpv): 42514000 Maschinen und Geräte zum Filtrieren oder Reinigen von Gasen
Zusätzliche Einstufung (cpv): 42514320 Gasfilter, 44615000 Druckbehälter, 44615100 Stahldruckbehälter
Optionen:
Beschreibung der Optionen: The framework agreement can be extended for (2x2 years) by a written notice to the Supplier no later than 3 months before the termination of the Agreement. Companies in which Energinet SOV or another company in the Energinet group acquire half or more than half of the capital or have the authority to exercise half or more than half of the voting rights or has the right to manage the company’s business regardless of the official name during the term of the Frame Agreement will have an option to use the Frame Agreement.
5.1.2.
Erfüllungsort
Land: Dänemark
Ort im betreffenden Land
Zusätzliche Informationen: Denmark – 7000 Fredericia, 5250 Bellinge, 7400 Herning og 4600 Køge
5.1.4.
Verlängerung
Maximale Verlängerungen: 2
Weitere Informationen zur Verlängerung: 2x2 years
5.1.5.
Wert
Geschätzter Wert ohne MwSt.: 17 000 000,00 EUR
Höchstwert der Rahmenvereinbarung: 23 800 000,00 EUR
5.1.6.
Allgemeine Informationen
Auftragsvergabeprojekt nicht aus EU-Mitteln finanziert
Die Beschaffung fällt unter das Übereinkommen über das öffentliche Beschaffungswesen: ja
Zusätzliche Informationen: It should be noted that this is a negotiated procedure. With the exception of basic elements, changes may be made to tender documents and their contents as a consequence as part of the negotiation process. The tenderer's legal form is not required. The applicant must submit a completed version of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD). The applicant must not be covered by the mandatory grounds for exclusion, cf. Act no. 10 of 6/1/2023 (Public Procurement Act) §134a, §135, subs. 1-3 and §136. Applications that have not been submitted to EU-Supply or that are received after the deadline will generally not be accepted. The Contracting Entity reserves the right to obtain additional, clarifying, or supplementing information from the applicant. Any questions relating to the application process must be submitted via the tender system. All questions will be answered to the extent that it is possible to submit an answer no later than six calendar days before the application deadline. Questions and answers, as well as any corrections, will be published in the tender system on an ongoing basis. Mandatory text (must be included): Tenders submitted must be valid for at least 3 months. If you wish to apply to participate in this tender process, the corresponding ESPD must be filled in. The ESPD for this tender process can be found in EU-Supply. The ESPD must be filled in in EU-Supply, after which it is submitted via "My answer". Guidelines for completing the ESPD can be found on the website of the Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen, www.kfst.dk (The contracting entity does not take responsibility for the content of the guidance). Please note the following: - An applicant who participates alone, but relies on the capacity of one or more other entities (e.g. a parent company or sister company or subcontractor) shall ensure that the application is accompanied by both the applicant's own ESPD and a separate ESPD for each entity on which it wishes to rely, with a completed Part II "Information on the economic operator" and Part III "Grounds for exclusion" as well as relevant information concerning Part IV "Selection criteria" and Part V: "Limiting the number of qualified applicants". The attached ESPD from those other entities should be duly completed and signed. In addition, the submission of final evidence must also be accompanied by evidence of the commitment of these entities/subcontractors in this respect in the form of a statement of support. - Where groups of economic operators, including temporary associations, apply together, a full ESPD shall be filled in separately for each participating economic operator containing the required information. The final documentation must also be accompanied by a Consortium Declaration, by which the parties declare to be a consortium or other form of association jointly and severally, unconditionally, and directly liable for the fulfilment of the contract tendered.
5.1.10.
Zuschlagskriterien
Kriterium:
Art: Preis
Bezeichnung: Price
Beschreibung: When evaluating “Price”, the Contracting authority will evaluate the grand total, contract price, cf. the Schedule of Prices.
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Prozentanteil, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 25
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Technical Solution
Beschreibung: In the evaluation of “Technical solution”, the Contracting Authority will evaluate the extent to which the tenderer complies with Contracting Authority specifications: Appendix 2.1: Deodorization Unit Technical Specification (doc. no. 24/06394-6) and appendix 2: Scope of Work; Costumer’s Requirements (doc. no. 24/06394-16) including the scope and content of any deviations in relation thereto. In this context, the elements listed below are of particular importance (in prioritized order): a) It is evaluated positive if the deodorization units electrical and mechanical equipment offer technology for efficiently removing odorant from bio natural gas. Further, a functional and simple design with manual operation is preferred of each plant. b) Adsorber process: • It is evaluated positive if the adsorber process includes long intervals between replacements of the adsorber material. • It is evaluated positive if procedures for replacement of adsorber material in the THT filter pressure vessels includes clear step by step procedures and easy access for all operations required for replacement of the adsorber material. c) Maintenance, hereunder: • It is evaluated positive, that the planned maintenance includes few and simple maintenance operations. • Further, long exchange intervals and easy access to perform the work with few special tools/components and minimum personnel needed are evaluated positive. d) Emissions: • It is evaluated positive, that actions are taken to reduce emissions from fabrication and under transportation. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Prozentanteil, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 35
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Quality management
Beschreibung: For the sub-criteria “Quality management”, the Contracting Authority will evaluate to which degree the tender provides assurance as to the quality of production. The evaluation will therefore include the tenderer’s ability to ensure quality in the entire production line and across all interfaces and will be evaluated to the extend the requirements from the technical specification as well as the requirements from standards are met. In this context, the elements listed below are of particular importance: e) Fabrication processes: • It is evaluated positive that project steps from design to mechanical completion are included, such as attention to sub-contracted and purchased parts. • It is evaluated positive that risks are identified, and mitigations described. • It is evaluated positive that manufacturing interfaces are kept at a minimum to prevent unnecessary risk. f) Inspection and Test Plan (ITP): • It is evaluated positive that the ITP includes steps for pre-fabrication, fabrication, surface treatment, assembly and testing. • Further, it is evaluated positive that topics identified include references to internal procedures as well as procedures of sub-contractors and third-party interventions to ensure that quality requirements are met. g) Quality management systems: • It is evaluated positive if tenderer and relevant sub-contractors have implemented third-party certified systems to support quality management. h) Sub-contractor management: • It is evaluated positive if relevant sub-contractors are approved or assessed. i) CE marking: • It is evaluated positive that third-party involvement is specified, and intervention points are identified for the CE marking process. j) Document control system: • It is evaluated positive if the document control system includes internal review and approval steps for master record data book (MRB) to reduce the time of follow up during review. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Prozentanteil, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 10
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Time schedule
Beschreibung: For the evaluation of “Time Schedule”, the Contracting Authority will evaluate the degree to which the tender demonstrates a well-planned, realistic and robust time schedule, which allows sufficient time for potential schedule contingencies, but still provides evidence of a high level of security for delivery within the timeframe set out in the Tender Documents. In this context it will be evaluated positive that: • The schedule reflects a realistic, but frontloaded schedule for the critical activities. • The schedule reflects sufficient time for 3rd party engagement. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Prozentanteil, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 5
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Delivery time
Beschreibung: The evaluation of “Delivery time” will be based on the stated delivery time as offered by the tenderer: • A maximum delivery time of up to 40 weeks will result in a score of 10, whereas a maximum delivery time of 52 weeks or more will result in a score of 0. In between these two points scores will be given on the basis of linear interpolation.
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Prozentanteil, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 5
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Project management
Beschreibung: Evaluation of the sub criterion “Project management” will be based on the competences and experiences demonstrated in the included CV’s and their relevance to the specified roles of the key persons. It will also be evaluated to which degree the individual key per-sonnel will be involved in fulfillment of the assignment and how they complement each other. Further, the evaluation will be based on whether the proposed organizational structure is operational, efficient and have clear lines of communication. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Prozentanteil, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 5
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Social sustainability
Beschreibung: Evaluation of case 1 will focus on the tenderer’s description of the supply chain management, within the specified key materials (steel, metal manufacturing including iron ore, coal). Of particular importance is: • Process description of the supply chain management for the key components (steel, metal manufacturing including iron ore, coal) of the objective of the purchase. • The degree of traceability for the raw material used in the production (tier 1, tier 2 etc.), the closer to the initial stage the company can trace the components, the higher score/will be evaluated positively. • Documentation that supports the process description, such as internal processes, strategies and measures and/or plan to request a certificate of origin, the use of blockchain technology etc. Evaluation of case 2 will focus on the tenderer’s description of management of Energinet’s Code of Conduct throughout the supply chain. Of particular importance is: • Process description of the management of CoC throughout the supply chain of the objective of the purchase. • The implementation of a Supplier Code of Conduct and contractual obligations, ensuring that suppliers are aware of and committed to up-holding human rights standards. • The degree of accountability/grievance mechanism en-suring access to a reporting channel for suppliers and sub-suppliers to report CoC violations, including clear procedure how to handle misconduct. • Supplier and sub-supplier visits/audits to ensure robust process when it comes to ensuring compliance with CoC throughout the supply chain, not only description but that actions are made. An overall evaluation will be conducted.
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Prozentanteil, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 5
Kriterium:
Art: Qualität
Bezeichnung: Contract terms
Beschreibung: The tendered assignment must be performed on the basis of the attached contract terms. The tenderer may, however, suggest explicit and well-explained deviations to the contractual terms which the Contracting Authority has identified as competitive criteria’s below: Framework Agreement (doc. 24/06394-14): o Sub-Clauses 10.4, 10.5 & 10.6 (Validity and Termination) Appendix 1: General Terms and Conditions for Works (doc. 24/06394-15): o Clause 2 (Requirements), except for sub-clause 2.3 o Sub-clause 5.6 (Advance payment guarantee – except for what is stated as mandatory parts of the Tender Documents, cf. sub-section 3.7.1 above) o Clause 10 (Time for Completion) o Clause 14 (Intellectual property rights) o Clause 15 (Late-delivery or non-delivery) o Clause 16 (Defects and remedies) o Clause 17 (Limitation of liability) o Clause 18 (Product liability) o Clause 19 (Insurance) o Clause 20 (Indemnification) o Clause 21 (Performance guarantee – except for what is stated as mandatory parts of the Tender Documents, cf. sub-section 2.7.1 above) o Clause 28 (Termination) o Appendix 1G: Insurance Exhibit (doc. 24/06394-20) Agreement under Framework Agreement (doc. 24/06394-18): o Section 7, sub-clause 10.1 (Time for Completion) o Section 7, sub-clause 15.1 (Late-delivery or non-delivery) o Section 7, sub-clause 16.1 and 16.6 (Defects and remedies) o Section 7, sub-clause 17.2 (Limitation of liability) o Section 7, sub-clause 19.1 (Insurance) o Section 7, sub-clause 20.1 + 20.3 (Performance Guarantee) o Section 7, sub-clause 23.3 (Code of conduct and HSE requirements) o Section 7, sub-clause 28.3 (Termination) These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion "Contract terms" and it is noted that any deviations may lead to a reduction to the score depending on the content, clarity, and consequence. In this regard it is explicitly noted that deviations which intends to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favor of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. No deviations, and thereby absolute fulfillment of the contract terms, will result in the maximum score of 10. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criteria. A minimum score of 4 must be achieved, cf. sub-section 3.7.1.
Kategorie des Gewicht-Zuschlagskriteriums: Gewichtung (Prozentanteil, genau)
Zuschlagskriterium — Zahl: 10
5.1.15.
Techniken
Rahmenvereinbarung:
Rahmenvereinbarung ohne erneuten Aufruf zum Wettbewerb
Informationen über das dynamische Beschaffungssystem:
Kein dynamisches Beschaffungssystem
5.1.16.
Weitere Informationen, Schlichtung und Nachprüfung
Überprüfungsstelle: Klagenævnet for Udbud
Informationen über die Überprüfungsfristen: Complaints regarding a candidate not being pre-qualified must be filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has sent notification to the candidates involved, provided that the notification includes a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision. Other complaints must be filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within: 1. 45 calendar days after the contracting authority has published a contract award notice in the Official Journal of the European Union (with effect from the day following the publication date); 2. 30 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has informed the tenderers in question, that the contracting authority has entered a contract based on a framework agreement through reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing system, provided that the notification includes a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision; 3. 6 months starting the day after the contracting authority has sent notification to the candidates/tenderers involved that the contracting authority has entered into the framework agreement, provided that the notification included a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision.
Organisation, die zusätzliche Informationen über das Vergabeverfahren bereitstellt: Energinet
Organisation, die einen Offline-Zugang zu den Vergabeunterlagen bereitstellt: Energinet
Organisation, die weitere Informationen für die Nachprüfungsverfahren bereitstellt: Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen
Organisation, die die Zahlung ausführt: Energinet
Organisation, die den Auftrag unterzeichnet: Energinet
TED eSender: Mercell Holding ASA