5.1.1.
Purpose
Main nature of the contract: Supplies
Main classification (cpv): 34928480 Waste and rubbish containers and bins
Additional classification (cpv): 44613700 Refuse skips, 44613800 Containers for waste material
Options:
Description of the options: The contracting authority requests tenders for 3 different options. Options A and B are included in the evaluation of the award criteria Price. Option C is not included in the price evaluation. The customer decides whether the different options shall be taken up or not. The following options are obligatory for tenderers to submit tenders for: A) Special containers for hazardous waste, approx. 30 L B) Food basket with lid for the kitchen counter, approx. 7 to 7.5 L C) Mobile waste container with gloves, approx. 40 L for storing food waste and glass /metal packaging
5.1.2.
Place of performance
Country subdivision (NUTS): Møre og Romsdal (NO0A3)
Country: Norway
5.1.4.
Renewal
Maximum renewals: 2
Other information about renewals: Renewal lenght is 12 months
5.1.5.
Value
Estimated value excluding VAT: 14 000 000,00 NOK
Maximum value of the framework agreement: 14 000 000,00 NOK
5.1.6.
General information
Reserved participation:
Participation is not reserved.
Procurement Project not financed with EU Funds.
The procurement is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA): no
5.1.9.
Selection criteria
Sources of selection criteria: Procurement Document
5.1.10.
Award criteria
Criterion:
Type: Price
Name: Price
Description: Tenderers shall fill in the attached price form in their cost calculation and deliver as annex to the tender in Excel format. All fields in the attached price form marked with yellow shall be completed. Missing completion of price fields may cause difficulty in assessing the tender, and the tender can then be Rejected. All prices are in NOK, excluding VAT, including all direct or indirect expenses and duties that can expected to be incurred for the delivery. Order fees and invoice fees are to be seen as expenses. The prices shall include all costs for the customer who is included in this competition. Costs That supplier knows that there will be, but which is not specifically stated in the tender, be seen as included in the stated costs. The price of option C is not included in the price evaluation. The contracting authority is mainly aiming for large individual orders of bins with full trailer load. When pricing bins, the tenderer shall assume that ordered full trailer loads. If the tenderer chooses to send the delivery in parts, this does not mean that it accrues transport expenses for the customer. Extra equipment/spare parts are not to be put up to a full trailer load. Vendor when pricing, of extra equipment/spare parts does not assume that full trailer loads are ordered. Evaluation: If the product lines in the price form are submitted blank/not filled in, they will be filled in with the highest the unit price offered for this product line + 10%.
Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)
Award criterion number: 55
Criterion:
Type: Quality
Name: Quality
Description: The Quality Award Criteria consists of three sub-criteria: • The sub-criteria product samples are weighted 60% of this award criteria quality. • The sub-criterion product documentation is weighted 25% of this award criteria. Quality. • The sub-criteria T-requirement is weighted 15% of this award criteria quality. Orientation: In this award criteria the customer evaluate the following: •Samples: The received product samples are evaluated here for the requested products. The Customer will, by evaluation of this sub-criteria particularly emphasise the experienced quality, pressure quality of lids, and how assembling and disassembly of wheels, axles and lids is easily experienced and Effectively. • Product documentation: The product documentation will be evaluated here in relation to the minimum requirements and the products in general, and specifically for assembly and disassembly of wheels and lids. For the products it shall delivered product samples an assessment will be made of the products based on both product samples and Attached product documentation. The other products will be assessed on the basis of product documentation. The entire catalogues shall not be enclosed with the product documentation. but concretely information on requested information. Entire directories to find answers will not be read or part of Evaluation. • Fulfilment of T-requirements in the requirement form: The tenderer will be evaluated here for responding to the T-requirements in the requirement form. Documentation beyond reply the requirement form shall be maximum 1 A4 page. This documentation shall not include a cover page or table of contents. Pages, if any, after page 1 will not be evaluated. Any links etc. in the responses in the requirement form and in documentation. beyond the requirement form will not be evaluated. Evaluation: This award criteria will be evaluated based on product samples, as well as product documentation and fulfilment of T-requirements. The options are not a part of the evaluation. During the evaluation, there will be made a Procurement evaluation. • Product samples: A combined score of between 0-10 per product, with Ten is best. One or several tenderers can score 10 points. Other tenders are to be given in relation to score per product. Points per product are multiplied by the estimated volume for the item line, before the sum per. item line pluses combined to a combined score for the tender. The tender with the highest combined score will be awarded ten points, and the other tenders will be given a relative score. • Product documentation: A combined point score will be given between 0-10 per. product, of which ten are Best. One or several tenderers can score 10 points. Other tenders will be given a relative scores per product. Points per product are multiplied by an estimated the volume of the item line, before the sum per product line is plus a combined score for the tender. The tender with the highest the total score will be given 10 points and the other tenders will be given a relative score score. • Fulfilment of T-requirements in the requirement form: 1 point will be given per fulfilled requirement. Best Deals, the with the most points combined for the T-requirements, 10 points will be awarded, other tenders will be given a relative score. Scores achieved on each of the sub-criteria will be multiplied by the involved weighting, and added Together. The tenderer ́s total points for this award criteria is weighted with the award criteria percentage of weighting.
Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)
Award criterion number: 15
Criterion:
Type: Quality
Name: Environment
Description: The award criteria is weighted 30%. The award criteria consists of two sub-criteria: • The sub-criteria O18 will be weighted 75% of this award criteria environment. • The sub-criteria O19 will be weighted 25% of this award criteria environment. Orientation: The contracting authority would like the offered bins and lids to fulfil the relevant parts of the criteria. number O18 and O19 in the Nordic environmental labelling criterie document "Svanenmärkning av Development, play and park equipment" , as described in this award criteria. The criteria and the the accompanying documentation requirements are translated into Norwegian below (Version 4.8 • March 15, 2021 - 31 December 2026). The criteria document is attached to the tender documentation and is also available here: The Swan Ecolabel Requirements for outdoor furniture, apparatuses for playgrounds, and park equipment - the Swan Ecolabel. If a product is environmentally labelled with the Swan Ecolabel, Blaue Engel or equivalent marking scheme and have a valid license number or valid certificate, it is sufficient that the name of environmental label + valid licence no. be filled in the "Price Form 2025". Such environmental marking automatically gives a full score for this the award criteria (both sub-criteria) and it is, then, not necessary to enclose Other Documentation. If a product is not environmentally labelled, but fulfils the criteria, the tenderer shall fill in referrals in price form to the relevant annex with documentation of fulfilment of the relevant Criterion. It is important that the referrals are unequivocal and that it is clear which documentation that Applies. 1. O18 80 % weighting Criteria: More than 30 weight% plastic is included in the product: At least 50 weight% of the plastic in the product shall consist of recycled plastic. At least 15 weight% of this must be post-consumer/commercial recycled plastic. The requirement for at least 15 weight% post-consumer/commercial recycled plastic applies depending on the the total amount of recycled plastic in the product. Recycled plastic is defined as "Svanenmärkning av Utemöbler, lek- och parkutrustning" (Version 4.8 • 15 March 2021 – 31 December 2026) under chapter "12 Definitioner" page 43 "Återvunnen plast". Documentation requirement: • The products of recycled plastic shall be given. • Description and documentation from the manufacturer of the recycled raw material that shows that the plastic recycled in accordance with the requirement definition. Alternatively certificate in accordance with the Global Recycled Standard or EUCertPlast which shows that the raw material is recycled or other equivalent certification approved by Nordic Environmental Labelling. • Calculation showing that the percentage of recycled plastic is fulfilled. If relevant, it must also be shown that the proportion of pre-consumption or post-consumption/commercially recycled plastic is fulfilled. 2. O19 20 % weighting Criteria: Recycled plastic must not include: • Brominated and chlorinated flame retardants •Cadmium •Lead •Mercury • Chrome VI Pollution up to 100 ppm is allowed. Documentation requirement: Documentation in the form of a test report (method XRF, x-ray) from the supplier of recycled plastic vids. that the requirement is met. The analysis laboratory/test instilutet auditorium fulfil the requirements in the annex. Alternatively, The requirement is to be documented with traceability to the source that shows that these substances are not in danger of being Including. Evaluation: This award criteria is assessed based on the tenderer ́s response in the price form and the annexes thereof. are displayed. Fulfilment of the individual criteria gives 10 points. If a criteria is not met, 0 points will be given. Scores achieved on each of the sub-criteria will be multiplied by interrelated weighting and added. Together. The tenderer ́s total points for this award criteria is weighted with the award criterion ́s percentage of weighting.
Category of award weight criterion: Weight (percentage, exact)
Award criterion number: 30
5.1.11.
Procurement documents
Deadline for requesting additional information: 10/02/2026 23:00:00 (UTC+00:00) Western European Time, GMT
5.1.12.
Terms of procurement
Terms of submission:
Electronic submission: Required
Languages in which tenders or requests to participate may be submitted: Norwegian
Electronic catalogue: Allowed
Deadline for receipt of tenders: 18/02/2026 11:00:58 (UTC+00:00) Western European Time, GMT
Duration during which the tender must remain valid: 89 Days
Information about public opening:
Opening date: 18/02/2026 11:01:00 (UTC+00:00) Western European Time, GMT
Terms of contract:
The execution of the contract must be performed within the framework of sheltered employment programmes: No
Electronic invoicing: Required
Electronic ordering will be used: yes
Electronic payment will be used: yes
5.1.15.
Techniques
Framework agreement:
Framework agreement, without reopening of competition
Maximum number of participants: 1
Information about the dynamic purchasing system:
No dynamic purchase system
5.1.16.
Further information, mediation and review
Review organisation: Møre og Romsdal tingrett
Information about review deadlines: Information on deadlines for processing appeals (Norwegian): Deadlines: Information on deadlines for appeals (Norwegian) It is as a main rule the district court in the contracting authority ́s household that shall be stated as the body responsible for the formal appeals proceedings. Neither the Contracting Authority itself, Kofa (the complaints body for public procurements) or other than the law courts is to be seen as a "formal complaints body". Therefore, it is the district court that will be correct to fill in the relevant field in the notice form. You can find your home https://www.domstol.no/om-domstolene/de-alminnelige-domstolene/tingrettene/.Selv if the Contracting Authority does not is a formal complaints body, in most cases it will be most appropriate for a tenderer or others with an appeals interest to initiate their appeals process with a enquiry with the contracting authority. The contracting authority has, on certain terms, the opportunity to to alter decisions he has made in a procurement process if the contracting authority will be made aware that the decision is contrary to procurement regulations. Also the cofa (the complaints body for public procurements) can be used as a complaints body. Kofa is also not to be considered a formal complaints body as they only give advisory statements on any breaches of procurement regulations. The exception from this is that Kofa can impose a an administrative fine for illegal direct procurements. Beyond the fine, it is only the courts that can put power behind their decisions.