2026-05-20+00:00 05:53:43+00:00 16 ORG-0001 Ålesund brannvesen KF Sjømannsvegen 1B Innkjøp Ålesund 6008 NO0A3 NOR 987780657 Marton Leine +47 70 16 32 00 marton.bjordal.leine@alesund.kommune.no https://www.domstol.no/no/domstoler/tingrett/more-og-romsdal-tingrett/ ORG-0002 Møre og Romsdal tingrett Postboks 1354 Ålesund 6001 NO0A3 NOR 926 723 200 70 33 47 00 more.og.romsdal.tingrett@domstol.no 00346996-202697/20262026-05-21+02:00 2.3 eforms-sdk-1.13 73bbc82d-5e22-469c-923d-839e8d3b26cf 25a909cb-8d5b-4357-b694-7b0fdb7c98e5 2026-05-20+00:00 05:40:38+00:00 01 32014L0024 cn-standard ENG body-pl-la gen-pub ORG-0001 exg-crim-corrpt Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a enforceable verdict has been convicted of corruption by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on Combating Corruption, Involving European Communities or European Union Member States (EUT C 195 of 25.6.1997, s. 1), and in Article 2, point 1, in the Council ́s framework decision 2003/568/RIA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (EUT L 192 of 31.7.2003, p. 54). This rejection reason also includes corruption as defined in national law for the contracting authority or supplier. exg-crim-fraud Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted of fraud has been convicted of fraud by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? exg-crim-laund Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of money laundering or financing terrorism by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? exg-crim-part Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted verdict of participation in a criminal organisation by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Participation in a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of the Council ́s framework decision 2008/841/RIA of 24 October 2008 on control of organised crime (EUT L 300 of 11.11.2008, p. 42) exg-crim-terror Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of acts of terrorism or criminal acts connected to terrorist activities by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Acts of terrorism or criminal acts relating to terrorist activity as defined in Article 1 and 3 of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/475/RIA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (EFT L 164, af 22.6.2002, p. 3). This rejection reason also includes incitement to, participation or attempts to commit such actions as included in Article 4 in the mentioned framework decision. exg-crim-traffick Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of child labour and other forms of human trafficking by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Child labour and other forms of human trafficking as defined in Article 2 of the European Parliament and council directive 2011/36/EU of 5. 1 April 2011 on the prevention and control of human trafficking and the protection of its victims and for compensation of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/629/RIA (EUT L 101 of 15.4.2011, p. 1). exg-mis-bre-env-law Is the tenderer aware of breaches of environmental provisions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. exg-mis-bre-lab-law Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on working conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. exg-mis-bre-soc-law Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on social conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. exg-mis-distortion Has the tenderer entered into agreement(s) with other tenderers with the intention of turning the competition? exg-mis-misconduct Has the tenderer committed serious errors in professional practice? If relevant, see the definitions in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents. exg-mis-misrepresent Has the tenderer: a) given grossly incorrect information with the notification of the information required to verify that there is no basis for rejection, or of the qualification requirements being fulfilled, b) failed to provide such information, c) made reservations immediately to present the supporting documents requested by the contracting authority, or d) improperly affected the contracting authority ́s decision process to acquire confidential information that could give this an unlawful advantage in connection with competition, or negligently has given misleading information that can have a significant influence on decisions on rejection, selection or award? exg-mis-partic-confl Is the tenderer aware of a conflict of interest as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents? exg-mis-prep-confl Has the tenderer or an entity associated with the supplier advised the contracting authority or in another way been involved in the planning of the competition? exg-mis-sanction Has the tenderer committed significant breaches of contract in connection with the fulfilment of a previous public contract, a previous contract with a public contracting authority or a previous concession contract, where the breach has led to the cancellation of the contract, compensation or other similar sanctions? exg-pmt-bre-ssc Have tenderers failed to fulfil all their social security obligations in the country where they are established and in their member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in? exg-pmt-bre-tax Has the tenderer not fulfilled all of his tax and duty obligations in both the country where he is established and in the contracting authority's member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in? exg-sitn-as-susp Has the tenderer's business conduct been stopped? exg-sitn-bankr Is the tenderer in a bankruptcy situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract. exg-sitn-cred-arran Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract. exg-sitn-insolvency Is the tenderer in an insolvency situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract. exg-sitn-liq-admin Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers in such a situation is obligatory in accordance with the current national law with no exceptions, when the tenderer is still able to carry out the contract. exg-sitn-other Is the tenderer in a similar situation in accordance with an equivalent procedure set in the national law? See the national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents. epo-notice Open tender contest open false 26/1253 Procurement - Protective clothing and middle clothing for fire prevention (sweeping), 2026 The objective of the agreement is to cover the contracting authority ́s need for protective clothing and middle clothing for fire prevention (sweeping owners), in accordance with the requirement specifications. supplies 3200000 2540000 35113400 18000000 18100000 18130000 18200000 18220000 18221000 18310000 18400000 35110000 35800000 35810000 35811100 Participants in the agreement: Ålesund Fire Brigade KF Stranda municipality. - Fjord municipality - Sykkylven municipality NO0A3 NOR LOT-0000 not-allowed no-eu-funds false allowed Lenke til innkjøpsdokumentene non-restricted-document https://tendsign.com/doc.aspx?MeFormsNoticeId=92281 none epo-procurement-document required no allowed false per-exa 45 quality Quality (product samples) Weighting:  The award criteria is weighted 45%. Orientation: The contracting authority will emphasise in the qualification process: Functionality Fit/Comfort The product ́s design to ensure good mobility and comfort when working high and above the shoulder height. Quality Design Overall impression See the requirement specifications section "Product Samples" for further information. Tenderers must reckon that the equipment will be tested within the intended use. Tenderers are asked to fill in a link and/or a referral to annexes, where the contracting authority can find product information on the products in all blue cells in the price and product form. Evaluation: This award criteria is assessed on the contracting authority ́s assessment of product samples, as well as the submitted product description of the products. A procurement assessment will be made during the evaluation.  A combined point score will be given between 1-10 per product, with 10 being the best. One or several tenderers can score 10 points. Other tenders will be given a relative score. The tenderer ́s total points for this award criteria is weighted with the award criteria ́s weighting percentage. per-exa 25 price Price Weighting: The award criteria is weighted 25%.  Orientation: Tenderers shall fill in the attached price form in their cost calculations and submit it as an annex to the tender in Excel format. All fields in the attached price form marked with yellow shall be completed. Missing the price fields can cause difficulties in assessing the tender and the tender can then be rejected. All prices are in NOK, excluding VAT, including all direct or indirect expenses and duties that could be incurred in connection with the delivery. Order fees and invoice fees are to be seen as expenses. The prices shall include all costs for the customer who is included in this competition, including the procurement commission. Costs that the tenderer knows will be incurred, but that are not specifically stated in the tender, will be seen as included in the stated costs. Evaluation: The total sum from the price form will form the basis of the price evaluation. When assessing the price, a hybrid model with break point 1 will be used. The attached template for the evaluation model is attached. (Remember to attach a template) The tenderer ́s total points for this award criteria is weighted with the award criteria ́s weighting percentage. per-exa 30 quality Environment Weighting:  The award criteria is weighted 30%. Orientation: The contracting authority will emphasise whether the products are labelled with the Swan Ecolabel or an equivalent environmental label type 1. Equivalent brand schemes are EU Ecolabel, GOTS, Blå Engel or Bra Miljøval. These marking schemes will be fully paid off in the evaluation, just like the Swan Ecolabel. Other labelling schemes will give a lower score, if the environmental labels are assessed as less relevant or comprehensive. For example, Fairtrade, Cotton Made in Africa (CMiA), Better Cotton Initiative (BCI), Økotex 100, ecologically labelled goods and Greenguard will give 25% value compared to the Swan Ecolabel. Økotex Made in Green gives 35% credit. Tenderers who offer other brands will have the legal responsibility to document that their environmental label can be seen as equal/equivalent with the marks specified above. When calculation of points on this criteria, the score for the individual products will be multiplied by the estimated volume stated in column H in the price form for the individual products. Documentation requirement Tenderers shall mark in column K "Award Criteria Environmental Label" in the Annex Requirement and Price Form, if the offered product is environmentally labelled. The name of the marking scheme must be given, and a valid licence number must either be given, or a valid certificate/licence certificate must be enclosed. If a license number is provided, it must be possible to apply for a license number on the brand scheme ́s website to check that it is valid. Marking schemes where it is sufficient to state valid licence numbers: The Swan Ecolabel, EU Ecolabel, Bra Miljøval, GOTS, Økotex 100, Økotex Made in Green. For Blue Angel, certificates/licence certificates must be enclosed, as it is not possible to apply for a licence number on Blå Engel ́s website. Other marking schemes must be examined before submitting a tender if it is possible to check any licence numbers on the brand scheme ́s website. Alternative documentation In accordance with PPR § 15 - 3 (2), the contracting authority shall accept alternative documentation if a tenderer is unable to participate in the marking scheme or an equivalent marking scheme by the deadline, and this is not due to the tenderer himself. This may be the case where the tenderer is offering a new product, or have recently taken over sales rights for a product. If alternative documentation is given, it is the tenderer ́s responsibility to facilitate this in an educational way so that it is easy to assess whether the requirements are met. If it takes more than four hours in total to assess alternative documentation in the tender, this can lead to the relevant documentation being rejected. If alternative documentation is accepted by the contracting authority, an application for a licence for offered products in the Swan Ecolabel or equivalent marking scheme will be sent as soon as possible after the contract has been signed and at the latest within three months. This shall be documented to the contracting authority. It is the tenderer ́s responsibility to ensure that sufficient documentation is given to the marking scheme in time. Evaluation: This award criteria will be assessed based on the tenderer ́s response in green cells in the requirement and price form and any accompanying annexes. A point score has been achieved per product (from 0-1) multiplied by the estimated volume for the product in question. The total point per product is then summed up to a total score for all of the products. Best solution (highest total score) will be awarded the highest score (10). Other solutions will be awarded a point score relative to the best solution. https://tendsign.com/doc.aspx?MeFormsNoticeId=92281&GoTo=Tender 89 In accordance with the regulations. ORG-0002 NOR true true required true 2026-06-22+00:00 10:00:58+00:00 2026-06-11+00:00 22:00:00+00:00 2026-06-22+00:00 10:01:00+00:00 false 1 none fa-wo-rc 26/1253 Procurement - Protective clothing and middle clothing for fire prevention (sweeping), 2026 The objective of the agreement is to cover the contracting authority ́s need for protective clothing and middle clothing for fire prevention (sweeping owners), in accordance with the requirement specifications. supplies true 3200000 2540000 35113400 18000000 18100000 18130000 18200000 18220000 18221000 18310000 18400000 35110000 35800000 35810000 35811100 Participants in the agreement: Ålesund Fire Brigade KF Stranda municipality. - Fjord municipality - Sykkylven municipality NO0A3 NOR 2 2 Renewal length is 12 months