2026-08-19+00:0011:43:40+00:00128605731RES-00019644236048609820selec-wORG-0001ORG-0001complainants1TEN-0001tenders4CON-0001LOT-0001RES-00029025763843252840selec-wORG-0001ORG-0001complainants1TEN-0002tenders4CON-0002LOT-0002RES-00035623179436743071selec-wORG-0001ORG-0001complainants1TEN-0003tenders4CON-0003LOT-0003TEN-0001false48609820noTPA-0001LOT-0001Lot 1 - NEA - Procurement of 400 kV cable systems (1)TEN-0002falsefalse43252840noTPA-0002LOT-0002Lot 2 - NEA - Procurement of 400 kV cable systems (1)TEN-0003false36743071noTPA-0001LOT-0003Lot 3 - SLF02 - Procurement of 400 kV and 132 kV cable systems (1)CON-00012026-08-04ZORG-0001Lot 1 - NEA - Procurement of 400 kV cable systems (1)TEN-0001CON-00022026-08-04ZORG-0001Lot 2 - NEA - Procurement of 400 kV cable systems (1)TEN-0002CON-00032026-08-04ZORG-0001Lot 3 - SLF02 - Procurement of 400 kV and 132 kV cable systems (1)TEN-0003TPA-0001ORG-0004TPA-0002ORG-000530https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/supplier/publictenders?B=ENERGINETORG-0001Energinet Eltransmission A/STonne Kjærsvej 65Energinet Eltransmission A/SFredericia7000DK032DNK39 31 48 78Procurement - A+45 70102244procurement@energinet.dkhttps://naevneneshus.dk/start-din-klage/klagenaevnet-for-udbud/ORG-0002Klagenævnet for UdbudNævnenes Hus, Toldboden 2Viborg8800DK021DNK37795526+45 72405708klfu@naevneneshus.dkhttp://www.kfst.dkORG-0003Konkurrence- og ForbrugerstyrelsenCarl Jacobsen Vej 35Valby2500DK012DNK10294819+45 41715000kfst@kfst.dklargeORG-0004LS Cable & System Ltd13-17F, LS TOWER, 127 LS-ro, Dongan-gu, Gyeonggi-doAnyang-si14119KOR138-81-47634+44 7469148769sandy.sarazin@lscns.comlargeORG-0005Taihan Cable & Solution Co., Ltd.317 Simin-daero, Dongan-gu14055Anyang-si, Gyeonggi-KOR119-81-10062+31 617056665sw1012@taihan.comhttp://mercell.com/ORG-0006Mercell Holding ASAAskekroken 11Oslo0277NO081NOR980921565eSender+47 21018800+47 21018801publication@mercell.com00577231-2026160/20262026-08-20+02:002.3eforms-sdk-1.134e0dc3ce-ae64-455e-ad01-b77379ddb04eb78bc229-3d81-4a61-9768-07bd447b5fba2026-08-19+00:0011:17:59+00:000132014L0025can-standardENGhttps://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/company/companyinformation/index/228008electricityORG-0001ted-esenORG-0006The tender is an EU Tender with negotiations. The tenders must be valid for a period of 6 months from the specified time limit for submissionneg-w-calltruec6349004-4949-4b21-87bc-86a9ca9875c2-0124/13859NEA and SLF02 – Procurement of 400 kV and 132 kV cable systemsThe Contracting Authority wants to purchase delivery of approximately 490 km 400 kV single core cable XLPE-insulated land cable and 15 km 132 kV single core XLPE-insulated land cable, joints and terminations and installation of joints and terminations. The deliverables are divided into three lots: Lot 1 – NEA, Lot 2 - NEA and Lot 3 – SLF02. The scope of the three tendered lots are described in detail in the enclosed tender documents. For further detail regarding the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents. However please note the following: The Contracting Authority will also accept solutions with a welded aluminum sheath. In case a welded aluminum sheath is offered, the sheath is allowed to carry the full fault current without the support of a wire screen. For further information see the technical requirements c.f. doc. no. 24/13859-18. It is possible to apply for prequalification for one, two or all three lots. The application should clearly state for which lot it concerns. Subsequent tenders may be submitted for Lots the tenderer is prequalified for. If an applicant applies for prequalification for all three Lots, but does not have the capacity for all, this must be clearly stated in the application. Please note that it is not possible to include a discount for being awarded more than one lot. If the same tenderer is evaluated with the highest score for more than one lot the tenderer will be awarded more than one lot provided the tenderer fulfils the aggregated minimum requirement for economic and financial standing cf. section 2.2.1 and section 4. The tender is divided into the following lots, and the value of the contracts is expected to amount to: • Lot 1 - NEA: Expected value: EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 2 – NEA: Expected value: EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 3 – SLF02: Expected value: EUR 28,200,00.00 For further detail concerning the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents.suppliesIt should be noted that this is a public tender. The Tender’s legal form is not required. If you wish to participate in this tender process, the corresponding ESPD must be filled in. The ESPD for this tender process can be found in EU-Supply. The ESPD must be filled in in EU-Supply, after which it is submitted via "My answer". Guidelines for completing the ESPD can be found on the website of the Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen, www.kfst.dk (The contracting entity does not take responsibility for the content of the guidance). Please note the following: - A tenderer who participates alone, but relies on the capacity of one or more other entities (e.g. a parent company or sister company or subcontractor) shall ensure that the tenderer is accompanied by both the tenderers own ESPD and a separate ESPD for each entity on which it wishes to rely, with a completed Part II "Information on the economic operator" and Part III "Grounds for exclusion" as well as relevant information concern-ing Part IV "Selection criteria". The attached ESPD from those other entities should be duly completed and signed. In addition, the submission of final evidence must also be accompanied by evidence of the commitment of these entities/subcontractors in this respect in the form of a statement of support. - Where groups of economic operators, including temporary associations, partici-pate together, a full ESPD shall be filled in separately for each participating economic operator containing the required information. The final documentation must also be accompanied by a Consortium Declaration, by which the parties declare to be a consortium or other form of association jointly and severally, unconditionally, and directly liable for the fulfilment of the contract tendered.1133000003132130031300000313200003134000031343000East Jutland – South Zealand - Denmarkanyw-couDNKLOT-0001no-eu-fundsper-exa55pricePriceWhen evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate the Total Tender Price in the submitted Schedules of Prices.per-exa15qualityTechnical SolutionThe Contracting Authority will focus on the documentation provided by the tenderer who are encouraged to submit detailed and thorough responses as the below listed elements will be of particular importance in the evaluation: 1. System design: The quality of the engineering documentation (based on design documentation, calculations, values, and statements), including the extent to which this provides evidence that the system is fit for purpose according to the Technical Requirements. Further, the robustness of the solution including documentation and calculations supporting this will be favored. In this context it will be considered positive if the solution provides evidence of having very robust jackets, a high level of pulling force, and provide evidence of water-prof design of joints and link-boxes. 2. Installation, setup and testing: The quality of the plan for installation of accessories and plan for testing during installation. It will be evaluated positively that the documents are detailed, practical and provide evidence of a solution which will secure ease of execution of work on site. 3. Minimum allowed bending radius: The minimum allowed bending radius during installation and after installation (in final position at terminations) is equally evaluated. A larger bending radius is evaluated negatively. 4. Allowable roller pressure: Allowable roller pressure will be evaluated. A higher roller pressure will be evaluated positively. 5. Lay length of screen wires (if applicable): Concerning lay length of screen wires (in multiple of screen diameter), longer lay length will be evaluated negatively. 6. Electrical stress: As for electrical stress at the insulation screen (outer semiconducting layer), a lower electrical stress will be evaluated positively. 7. AC resistance: Will be evaluated based on a combination of the tenderers stated value and quality of available documentation to support this. A lower AC resistance will be evaluated positively. Higher similarity of tested conductor to offered will be evaluated positively. 8. Current rating: Both continuous and short term rating will be evaluated. A higher current rating will be evaluated positively. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterionper-exa20qualityProgramme, organization and manpowerThe evaluation will be based on to which degree the tenderer demonstrates a well-planned, realistic, and robust time schedule/programme, which allows sufficient time for potential contingencies, but still provides evidence of a high level of security for delivery within the timeframe as set out. In this context it will be evaluated positive that: 1) the description and the Project Programme reflect a realistic, and frontloaded, programme for the critical activities including production and considerations for actions in case of unforeseen events (breakdown etc.). 2) the description and programme contain a robust production schedule including all tests, delivery time, robust planning for installation of joints and cable terminations, and supervision activities on site and the associated manpower. 3) the description demonstrates the tenderer’s ability to identify and overcome known risks in the production, transportation, and installation phases. 4) the description provides an operational organisation on site in Denmark, with clear roles, responsibilities, hierarchy and procedures for escalation. Further, interfaces are handled with clear lines for communication. 5) the ability to extent personnel on site in case of unforeseen delays concerning the jointing work is also covered by the description and ensures efficient execution at all time. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.per-exa10qualityContract termsThe tendered assignment must be performed on the basis of the attached contract terms. Apart from the clauses and sub-clauses listed in section 3.7.1, which are not part of the evaluation of “Contract terms”, it is possible for the tenderer to make explicit and well-explained deviations. These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion "Contract terms" and it is noted that any deviation(s) may lead to a reduction to the score depending on content, clarity, and consequence of the deviation. In this regard, it is explicitly noted that deviations which intends to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favour of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. A minimum score of 4 must be achieved, cf. sub-section 3.7.1. If the tenderer has no deviations the evaluation of this sub-criterion will result in the maximum score of 10. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.ORG-0001ORG-0001Complaints regarding a candidate not being pre-qualified must be filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has sent notification to the candidates involved, provided that the notification includes a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision. Other complaints must be filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within: 1. 45 calendar days after the contracting authority has published a contract award notice in the Official Journal of the European Union (with effect from the day following the publication date); 2. 30 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has informed the tenderers in question, that the contracting authority has entered a contract based on a framework agreement through reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing system, provided that the notification includes a short account of the rele-vant reasons for the decision; 3. 6 months starting the day after the contracting authority has sent notification to the candidates/tenderers involved that the contracting authority has entered into the framework agreement, provided that the notification included a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision.ORG-0003ORG-0002truefalsenonenone24/13859 - Lot 1Lot 1 - NEA - Procurement of 400 kV cable systems (1)The Contracting Authority wants to purchase delivery of approximately 490 km 400 kV single core cable XLPE-insulated land cable and 15 km 132 kV single core XLPE-insulated land cable, joints and terminations and installation of joints and terminations. The deliverables are divided into three lots: Lot 1 – NEA, Lot 2 - NEA and Lot 3 – SLF02. The scope of the three tendered lots are described in detail in the enclosed tender documents. For further detail regarding the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents. However please note the following: The Contracting Authority will also accept solutions with a welded aluminum sheath. In case a welded aluminum sheath is offered, the sheath is allowed to carry the full fault current without the support of a wire screen. For further information see the technical requirements c.f. doc. no. 24/13859-18. It is possible to apply for prequalification for one, two or all three lots. The application should clearly state for which lot it concerns. Subsequent tenders may be submitted for Lots the tenderer is prequalified for. If an applicant applies for prequalification for all three Lots, but does not have the capacity for all, this must be clearly stated in the application. Please note that it is not possible to include a discount for being awarded more than one lot. If the same tenderer is evaluated with the highest score for more than one lot the tenderer will be awarded more than one lot provided the tenderer fulfils the aggregated minimum requirement for economic and financial standing cf. section 2.2.1 and section 4. The tender is divided into the following lots, and the value of the contracts is expected to amount to: • Lot 1 - NEA: Expected value: EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 2 – NEA: Expected value: EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 3 – SLF02: Expected value: EUR 28,200,00.00 For further detail concerning the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents.suppliesIt should be noted that this is a public tender. The Tender’s legal form is not required. If you wish to participate in this tender process, the corresponding ESPD must be filled in. The ESPD for this tender process can be found in EU-Supply. The ESPD must be filled in in EU-Supply, after which it is submitted via "My answer". Guidelines for completing the ESPD can be found on the website of the Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen, www.kfst.dk (The contracting entity does not take responsibility for the content of the guidance). Please note the following: - A tenderer who participates alone, but relies on the capacity of one or more other entities (e.g. a parent company or sister company or subcontractor) shall ensure that the tenderer is accompanied by both the tenderers own ESPD and a separate ESPD for each entity on which it wishes to rely, with a completed Part II "Information on the economic operator" and Part III "Grounds for exclusion" as well as relevant information concern-ing Part IV "Selection criteria". The attached ESPD from those other entities should be duly completed and signed. In addition, the submission of final evidence must also be accompanied by evidence of the commitment of these entities/subcontractors in this respect in the form of a statement of support. - Where groups of economic operators, including temporary associations, partici-pate together, a full ESPD shall be filled in separately for each participating economic operator containing the required information. The final documentation must also be accompanied by a Consortium Declaration, by which the parties declare to be a consortium or other form of association jointly and severally, unconditionally, and directly liable for the fulfilment of the contract tendered.425500003132130031300000313200003134000031343000East Jutland - Denmarkanyw-couDNK2026-01-16Z2032-10-21ZN/A0LOT-0002no-eu-fundsper-exa55pricePriceWhen evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate the Total Tender Price in the submitted Schedules of Prices.per-exa15qualityTechnical SolutionThe Contracting Authority will focus on the documentation provided by the tenderer who are encouraged to submit detailed and thorough responses as the below listed elements will be of particular importance in the evaluation: 1. System design: The quality of the engineering documentation (based on design documentation, calculations, values, and statements), including the extent to which this provides evidence that the system is fit for purpose according to the Technical Requirements. Further, the robustness of the solution including documentation and calculations supporting this will be favored. In this context it will be considered positive if the solution provides evidence of having very robust jackets, a high level of pulling force, and provide evidence of water-prof design of joints and link-boxes. 2. Installation, setup and testing: The quality of the plan for installation of accessories and plan for testing during installation. It will be evaluated positively that the documents are detailed, practical and provide evidence of a solution which will secure ease of execution of work on site. 3. Minimum allowed bending radius: The minimum allowed bending radius during installation and after installation (in final position at terminations) is equally evaluated. A larger bending radius is evaluated negatively. 4. Allowable roller pressure: Allowable roller pressure will be evaluated. A higher roller pressure will be evaluated positively. 5. Lay length of screen wires (if applicable): Concerning lay length of screen wires (in multiple of screen diameter), longer lay length will be evaluated negatively. 6. Electrical stress: As for electrical stress at the insulation screen (outer semiconducting layer), a lower electrical stress will be evaluated positively. 7. AC resistance: Will be evaluated based on a combination of the tenderers stated value and quality of available documentation to support this. A lower AC resistance will be evaluated positively. Higher similarity of tested conductor to offered will be evaluated positively. 8. Current rating: Both continuous and short term rating will be evaluated. A higher current rating will be evaluated positively. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterionper-exa20qualityProgramme, organization and manpowerThe evaluation will be based on to which degree the tenderer demonstrates a well-planned, realistic, and robust time schedule/programme, which allows sufficient time for potential contingencies, but still provides evidence of a high level of security for delivery within the timeframe as set out. In this context it will be evaluated positive that: 1) the description and the Project Programme reflect a realistic, and frontloaded, programme for the critical activities including production and considerations for actions in case of unforeseen events (breakdown etc.). 2) the description and programme contain a robust production schedule including all tests, delivery time, robust planning for installation of joints and cable terminations, and supervision activities on site and the associated manpower. 3) the description demonstrates the tenderer’s ability to identify and overcome known risks in the production, transportation, and installation phases. 4) the description provides an operational organisation on site in Denmark, with clear roles, responsibilities, hierarchy and procedures for escalation. Further, interfaces are handled with clear lines for communication. 5) the ability to extent personnel on site in case of unforeseen delays concerning the jointing work is also covered by the description and ensures efficient execution at all time. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.per-exa10qualityContract termsThe tendered assignment must be performed on the basis of the attached contract terms. Apart from the clauses and sub-clauses listed in section 3.7.1, which are not part of the evaluation of “Contract terms”, it is possible for the tenderer to make explicit and well-explained deviations. These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion "Contract terms" and it is noted that any deviation(s) may lead to a reduction to the score depending on content, clarity, and consequence of the deviation. In this regard, it is explicitly noted that deviations which intends to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favour of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. A minimum score of 4 must be achieved, cf. sub-section 3.7.1. If the tenderer has no deviations the evaluation of this sub-criterion will result in the maximum score of 10. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.ORG-0001ORG-0001Complaints regarding a candidate not being pre-qualified must be filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has sent notification to the candidates involved, provided that the notification includes a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision. Other complaints must be filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within: 1. 45 calendar days after the contracting authority has published a contract award notice in the Official Journal of the European Union (with effect from the day following the publication date); 2. 30 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has informed the tenderers in question, that the contracting authority has entered a contract based on a framework agreement through reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing system, provided that the notification includes a short account of the rele-vant reasons for the decision; 3. 6 months starting the day after the contracting authority has sent notification to the candidates/tenderers involved that the contracting authority has entered into the framework agreement, provided that the notification included a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision.ORG-0003ORG-0002truefalsenonenone24/13859 - Lot 2Lot 2 - NEA - Procurement of 400 kV cable systems (1)The Contracting Authority wants to purchase delivery of approximately 490 km 400 kV single core cable XLPE-insulated land cable and 15 km 132 kV single core XLPE-insulated land cable, joints and terminations and installation of joints and terminations. The deliverables are divided into three lots: Lot 1 – NEA, Lot 2 - NEA and Lot 3 – SLF02. The scope of the three tendered lots are described in detail in the enclosed tender documents. For further detail regarding the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents. However please note the following: The Contracting Authority will also accept solutions with a welded aluminum sheath. In case a welded aluminum sheath is offered, the sheath is allowed to carry the full fault current without the support of a wire screen. For further information see the technical requirements c.f. doc. no. 24/13859-18. It is possible to apply for prequalification for one, two or all three lots. The application should clearly state for which lot it concerns. Subsequent tenders may be submitted for Lots the tenderer is prequalified for. If an applicant applies for prequalification for all three Lots, but does not have the capacity for all, this must be clearly stated in the application. Please note that it is not possible to include a discount for being awarded more than one lot. If the same tenderer is evaluated with the highest score for more than one lot the tenderer will be awarded more than one lot provided the tenderer fulfils the aggregated minimum requirement for economic and financial standing cf. section 2.2.1 and section 4. The tender is divided into the following lots, and the value of the contracts is expected to amount to: • Lot 1 - NEA: Expected value: EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 2 – NEA: Expected value: EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 3 – SLF02: Expected value: EUR 28,200,00.00 For further detail concerning the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents.suppliesIt should be noted that this is a public tender. The Tender’s legal form is not required. If you wish to participate in this tender process, the corresponding ESPD must be filled in. The ESPD for this tender process can be found in EU-Supply. The ESPD must be filled in in EU-Supply, after which it is submitted via "My answer". Guidelines for completing the ESPD can be found on the website of the Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen, www.kfst.dk (The contracting entity does not take responsibility for the content of the guidance). Please note the following: - A tenderer who participates alone, but relies on the capacity of one or more other entities (e.g. a parent company or sister company or subcontractor) shall ensure that the tenderer is accompanied by both the tenderers own ESPD and a separate ESPD for each entity on which it wishes to rely, with a completed Part II "Information on the economic operator" and Part III "Grounds for exclusion" as well as relevant information concern-ing Part IV "Selection criteria". The attached ESPD from those other entities should be duly completed and signed. In addition, the submission of final evidence must also be accompanied by evidence of the commitment of these entities/subcontractors in this respect in the form of a statement of support. - Where groups of economic operators, including temporary associations, partici-pate together, a full ESPD shall be filled in separately for each participating economic operator containing the required information. The final documentation must also be accompanied by a Consortium Declaration, by which the parties declare to be a consortium or other form of association jointly and severally, unconditionally, and directly liable for the fulfilment of the contract tendered.425500003132130031300000313200003134000031343000East Jutlandanyw-couDNK2026-01-16Z2032-01-15ZN/A0LOT-0003no-eu-fundsper-exa55pricePriceWhen evaluating 'Price', the Contracting Authority will evaluate the Total Tender Price in the submitted Schedules of Prices.per-exa15qualityTechnical SolutionThe Contracting Authority will focus on the documentation provided by the tenderer who are encouraged to submit detailed and thorough responses as the below listed elements will be of particular importance in the evaluation: 1. System design: The quality of the engineering documentation (based on design documentation, calculations, values, and statements), including the extent to which this provides evidence that the system is fit for purpose according to the Technical Requirements. Further, the robustness of the solution including documentation and calculations supporting this will be favored. In this context it will be considered positive if the solution provides evidence of having very robust jackets, a high level of pulling force, and provide evidence of water-prof design of joints and link-boxes. 2. Installation, setup and testing: The quality of the plan for installation of accessories and plan for testing during installation. It will be evaluated positively that the documents are detailed, practical and provide evidence of a solution which will secure ease of execution of work on site. 3. Minimum allowed bending radius: The minimum allowed bending radius during installation and after installation (in final position at terminations) is equally evaluated. A larger bending radius is evaluated negatively. 4. Allowable roller pressure: Allowable roller pressure will be evaluated. A higher roller pressure will be evaluated positively. 5. Lay length of screen wires (if applicable): Concerning lay length of screen wires (in multiple of screen diameter), longer lay length will be evaluated negatively. 6. Electrical stress: As for electrical stress at the insulation screen (outer semiconducting layer), a lower electrical stress will be evaluated positively. 7. AC resistance: Will be evaluated based on a combination of the tenderers stated value and quality of available documentation to support this. A lower AC resistance will be evaluated positively. Higher similarity of tested conductor to offered will be evaluated positively. 8. Current rating: Both continuous and short term rating will be evaluated. A higher current rating will be evaluated positively. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterionper-exa20qualityProgramme, organization and manpowerThe evaluation will be based on to which degree the tenderer demonstrates a well-planned, realistic, and robust time schedule/programme, which allows sufficient time for potential contingencies, but still provides evidence of a high level of security for delivery within the timeframe as set out. In this context it will be evaluated positive that: 1) the description and the Project Programme reflect a realistic, and frontloaded, programme for the critical activities including production and considerations for actions in case of unforeseen events (breakdown etc.). 2) the description and programme contain a robust production schedule including all tests, delivery time, robust planning for installation of joints and cable terminations, and supervision activities on site and the associated manpower. 3) the description demonstrates the tenderer’s ability to identify and overcome known risks in the production, transportation, and installation phases. 4) the description provides an operational organisation on site in Denmark, with clear roles, responsibilities, hierarchy and procedures for escalation. Further, interfaces are handled with clear lines for communication. 5) the ability to extent personnel on site in case of unforeseen delays concerning the jointing work is also covered by the description and ensures efficient execution at all time. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.per-exa10qualityContract termsThe tendered assignment must be performed on the basis of the attached contract terms. Apart from the clauses and sub-clauses listed in section 3.7.1, which are not part of the evaluation of “Contract terms”, it is possible for the tenderer to make explicit and well-explained deviations. These will be included in the evaluation of the sub-criterion "Contract terms" and it is noted that any deviation(s) may lead to a reduction to the score depending on content, clarity, and consequence of the deviation. In this regard, it is explicitly noted that deviations which intends to limit liability and shift the financial risk in favour of the tenderer will be of particular importance in the evaluation. A minimum score of 4 must be achieved, cf. sub-section 3.7.1. If the tenderer has no deviations the evaluation of this sub-criterion will result in the maximum score of 10. An overall evaluation will be made of this sub-criterion.ORG-0001ORG-0001Complaints regarding a candidate not being pre-qualified must be filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within 20 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has sent notification to the candidates involved, provided that the notification includes a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision. Other complaints must be filed with The Complaints Board for Public Procurement within: 1. 45 calendar days after the contracting authority has published a contract award notice in the Official Journal of the European Union (with effect from the day following the publication date); 2. 30 calendar days starting the day after the contracting authority has informed the tenderers in question, that the contracting authority has entered a contract based on a framework agreement through reopening of competition or a dynamic purchasing system, provided that the notification includes a short account of the rele-vant reasons for the decision; 3. 6 months starting the day after the contracting authority has sent notification to the candidates/tenderers involved that the contracting authority has entered into the framework agreement, provided that the notification included a short account of the relevant reasons for the decision.ORG-0003ORG-0002truefalsenonenone24/13859 - Lot 3Lot 3 - SLF02 - Procurement of 400 kV and 132 kV cable systems (1)The Contracting Authority wants to purchase delivery of approximately 490 km 400 kV single core cable XLPE-insulated land cable and 15 km 132 kV single core XLPE-insulated land cable, joints and terminations and installation of joints and terminations. The deliverables are divided into three lots: Lot 1 – NEA, Lot 2 - NEA and Lot 3 – SLF02. The scope of the three tendered lots are described in detail in the enclosed tender documents. For further detail regarding the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents. However please note the following: The Contracting Authority will also accept solutions with a welded aluminum sheath. In case a welded aluminum sheath is offered, the sheath is allowed to carry the full fault current without the support of a wire screen. For further information see the technical requirements c.f. doc. no. 24/13859-18. It is possible to apply for prequalification for one, two or all three lots. The application should clearly state for which lot it concerns. Subsequent tenders may be submitted for Lots the tenderer is prequalified for. If an applicant applies for prequalification for all three Lots, but does not have the capacity for all, this must be clearly stated in the application. Please note that it is not possible to include a discount for being awarded more than one lot. If the same tenderer is evaluated with the highest score for more than one lot the tenderer will be awarded more than one lot provided the tenderer fulfils the aggregated minimum requirement for economic and financial standing cf. section 2.2.1 and section 4. The tender is divided into the following lots, and the value of the contracts is expected to amount to: • Lot 1 - NEA: Expected value: EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 2 – NEA: Expected value: EUR 42,550,000.00 • Lot 3 – SLF02: Expected value: EUR 28,200,00.00 For further detail concerning the purchase, reference is made to the tender documents.suppliesIt should be noted that this is a public tender. The Tender’s legal form is not required. If you wish to participate in this tender process, the corresponding ESPD must be filled in. The ESPD for this tender process can be found in EU-Supply. The ESPD must be filled in in EU-Supply, after which it is submitted via "My answer". Guidelines for completing the ESPD can be found on the website of the Konkurrence- og Forbrugerstyrelsen, www.kfst.dk (The contracting entity does not take responsibility for the content of the guidance). Please note the following: - A tenderer who participates alone, but relies on the capacity of one or more other entities (e.g. a parent company or sister company or subcontractor) shall ensure that the tenderer is accompanied by both the tenderers own ESPD and a separate ESPD for each entity on which it wishes to rely, with a completed Part II "Information on the economic operator" and Part III "Grounds for exclusion" as well as relevant information concern-ing Part IV "Selection criteria". The attached ESPD from those other entities should be duly completed and signed. In addition, the submission of final evidence must also be accompanied by evidence of the commitment of these entities/subcontractors in this respect in the form of a statement of support. - Where groups of economic operators, including temporary associations, partici-pate together, a full ESPD shall be filled in separately for each participating economic operator containing the required information. The final documentation must also be accompanied by a Consortium Declaration, by which the parties declare to be a consortium or other form of association jointly and severally, unconditionally, and directly liable for the fulfilment of the contract tendered.282000003132130031300000313200003134000031343000South Zealand - Denmarkanyw-couDNK2026-01-16Z2030-10-24ZN/A02000-01-01Z