2024-06-18+00:00 05:52:06+00:00 e0a9478a-6be6-4417-9261-5e5f8064d783-01 The correct name of scenario 2 is: "scenario 2 - mobility, identity and availability. And an amendment to the tender deadline. 2024-06-16+00:00 true LOT-0000 update-add The correct name of scenario 2 is: "scenario 2 - mobility, identity and availability. And an amendment to the tender deadline. 16 ORG-0001 Moss kommune Kirkegata 15 Innkjøp Moss 1501 NOR 920817521 Karl Petter Kristiansen 69278000 karlpetter@innkjopskontoret.no https://www.domstol.no/no/domstoler/tingrett/sondre-ostfold-tingrett/ ORG-0002 Søndre Østfold tingrett Postboks 113 Fredrikstad 1601 NO082 NOR 926 722 808 69 79 77 00 sondre.ostfold.tingrett@domstol.no 00361021-2024118/20242024-06-19Z 2.3 eforms-sdk-1.7 3bd1da99-b50f-49d9-8515-b0bab9c36f65 4a279f35-fd70-4fcd-9f6f-3eda7e80fdc3 2024-06-18+00:00 05:38:32+00:00 01 32014L0024 cn-standard ENG pub-undert gen-pub ORG-0001 bankr-nat Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. bankruptcy Is the tenderer in a bankruptcy situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. corruption Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a enforceable verdict has been convicted of corruption by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on Combating Corruption, Involving European Communities or European Union Member States (EUT C 195 of 25.6.1997, s. 1), and in Article 2, point 1, in the Council ́s framework decision 2003/568/RIA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (EUT L 192 of 31.7.2003, p. 54). This rejection reason also includes corruption as defined in national law for the contracting authority or supplier. cred-arran Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. crime-org Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted verdict of participation in a criminal organisation by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Participation in a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of the Council ́s framework decision 2008/841/RIA of 24 October 2008 on control of organised crime (EUT L 300 of 11.11.2008, p. 42) distorsion Has the tenderer entered into agreement(s) with other tenderers with the intention of turning the competition? envir-law Is the tenderer aware of breaches of environmental provisions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. finan-laund Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of money laundering or financing terrorism by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Money laundering or financing terrorism As defined in Article 1 of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2005/60/EF of 26 October 2005 on preventive measures against the use of the financial system for money laundering and financing terrorism (EUT L 309 of 25.11.2005, p. 15). fraud Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted of fraud has been convicted of fraud by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Fraud included in Article 1 of the Convention on protection of the Financial Interests of the European Communities (EFT C 316 of 27.11.1995, p. 48). human-traffic Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of child labour and other forms of human trafficking by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Child labour and other forms of human trafficking as defined in Article 2 of the European Parliament and council directive 2011/36/EU of 5. 1 April 2011 on the prevention and control of human trafficking and the protection of its victims and for compensation of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/629/RIA (EUT L 101 of 15.4.2011, p. 1). insolvency Is the tenderer in an insolvency situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. labour-law Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on working conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. liq-admin Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. misrepresent Has the tenderer: a) given grossly incorrect information with the notification of the information required to verify that there is no basis for rejection, or of the qualification requirements being fulfilled, b) failed to provide such information, c) made reservations immediately to present the supporting documents requested by the contracting authority, or d) improperly affected the contracting authority ́s decision process to acquire confidential information that could give this an unlawful advantage in connection with competition, or negligently has given misleading information that can have a significant influence on decisions on rejection, selection or award? partic-confl Are tenderers aware of a conflict of interest as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents? prep-confl Has the tenderer or an entity associated with the supplier advised the contracting authority or in another way been involved in the planning of the competition? prof-misconduct Has the tenderer committed serious errors in professional practice? If relevant, see the definitions in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents. sanction Has the tenderer committed significant breaches of contract in connection with the fulfilment of a previous public contract, a previous contract with a public contracting authority or a previous concession contract, where the breach has led to the cancellation of the contract, compensation or other similar sanctions? socsec-law Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on social conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. socsec-pay Have tenderers failed to fulfil all their social security obligations in the country where they are established and in their member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in? susp-act Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. tax-pay Has the tenderer not fulfilled his tax and duty obligations in the country in which he is established, and in the contracting authority's member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in? terr-offence Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of acts of terrorism or criminal acts connected to terrorist activities by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Acts of terrorism or criminal acts relating to terrorist activity as defined in Article 1 and 3 of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/475/RIA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (EFT L 164, af 22.6.2002, p. 3). This rejection reason also includes incitement to, participation or attempts to commit such actions as included in Article 4 in the mentioned framework decision. The competition will be held in accordance with the Public Procurement Act from 17 June 2016 no. 73 (LOA), with the accompanying regulations of 12 August 2016 no. 974 (FOA), as well as the provisions in this tender documentation. The competition will be held as TED - open tender contest in accordance with the regulations Parts I and III. All interested tenderers can submit tenders for this type of procedure. Negotiations are not allowed. The procurement is announced in the DOFFIN and TED database. open false 24/5350 (24149) Feasibility study - parallel assignments The competition is for the delivery of a feasibility study - parallel assignments.  The main aim of the parallel assignment is to get input on solution proposals that show how the area, from Tollboden in the north – on both sides of the Channel – to Kleberget in the south, on its native terms, can be developed with a comprehensive urban structure and as a living urban area. Ideas and proposals that come through the parallel assignment will be part of the knowledge basis to revise the centre plan and clarify the overall frameworks and terms that must be used to ensure a successful development of the area over time and in the correct order. An important premise is therefore to highlight the plan grips – final and temporary – that create a gradual/gradual alteration from what it is today until what it can and ought to be. The procurement ́s value is estimated to: NOK 2,400,000 excluding VAT, i.e. above the EEA threshold. The volume is an estimate and is not binding for the contracting authority. 1 tenderer will be chosen in each group, who each receives a fee of mine. 800.000,-. In addition there is an option for extra allocation of the assignments in connection with any cooperation with other external partners.  See the procurement documents for further information. services 71000000 71400000 NO082 NOR LOT-0000 ef-stand Certificates for tax and VAT. used ef-stand Other economic and financial requirements: Economic and financial position. used other This fulfils the objective and non-discriminatory criteria or rules that shall be used to select the number of tenderers in the following way: If certain certificates or other forms of documentation are requested, indicate for each individual whether the tenderer is in possession of the requested documents: If any of these certificates or other forms of documentation are available in electronic form, the certificates are to be provided for each: used other The tenderer fulfils the stated qualification requirements: used sui-act n-used tp-abil n-used no-eu-funds false Lenke til innkjøpsdokumentene non-restricted-document https://tendsign.com/doc.aspx?MeFormsNoticeId=23162 none required no allowed true per-exa 60 quality Solution proposal per-exa 40 quality Assignment specific competence https://tendsign.com/doc.aspx?MeFormsNoticeId=23162&GoTo=Tender 82 ORG-0002 NOR true true required false 2024-08-12+00:00 10:00:58+00:00 2024-06-27+00:00 22:00:00+00:00 2024-08-12+00:00 10:01:00+00:00 false none none 24/5350 (24149) Feasibility study - parallel assignments The competition is for the delivery of a feasibility study - parallel assignments.  The main aim of the parallel assignment is to get input on solution proposals that show how the area, from Tollboden in the north – on both sides of the Channel – to Kleberget in the south, on its native terms, can be developed with a comprehensive urban structure and as a living urban area. Ideas and proposals that come through the parallel assignment will be part of the knowledge basis to revise the centre plan and clarify the overall frameworks and terms that must be used to ensure a successful development of the area over time and in the correct order. An important premise is therefore to highlight the plan grips – final and temporary – that create a gradual/gradual alteration from what it is today until what it can and ought to be. The procurement ́s value is estimated to: NOK 2,400,000 excluding VAT, i.e. above the EEA threshold. The volume is an estimate and is not binding for the contracting authority. 1 tenderer will be chosen in each group, who each receives a fee of mine. 800.000,-. In addition there is an option for extra allocation of the assignments in connection with any cooperation with other external partners.  See the procurement documents for further information. services 71000000 71400000 NO082 NOR 2024-08-31+00:00 2024-11-14+00:00