2025-07-04+00:00 08:52:24+00:00 18 http://www.forsvarsbygg.no ORG-0001 Forsvarsbygg Grev Wedels plass 5 OSLO 0151 NO081 NOR 975950662 Mats Øverås 90282857 mats.overas@forsvarsbygg.no ORG-0002 Oslo tingrett Oslo 0164 NO081 NOR 926 725 939 00437743-2025127/20252025-07-07+02:00 2.3 eforms-sdk-1.13 c6bea32b-48de-41c0-87a3-6f1181bdc277 4da9d172-420a-4d67-8d8b-76527982a54a 2025-07-04+00:00 08:41:06+00:00 01 32009L0081 cn-standard ENG ORG-0001 Forsvar og sikkerhet The competition concerns a procurement above the EEA threshold set in the Regulations on Defence and Security Procurements (FOSA) § 2-2, and follows the rules in this regulation's parts I and II. exg-crim-corrpt Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a enforceable verdict has been convicted of corruption by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on Combating Corruption, Involving European Communities or European Union Member States (EUT C 195 of 25.6.1997, s. 1), and in Article 2, point 1, in the Council ́s framework decision 2003/568/RIA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (EUT L 192 of 31.7.2003, p. 54). This rejection reason also includes corruption as defined in national law for the contracting authority or supplier. exg-crim-fraud Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted of fraud has been convicted of fraud by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Fraud included in Article 1 of the Convention on protection of the Financial Interests of the European Communities (EFT C 316 of 27.11.1995, p. 48). exg-crim-laund Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of money laundering or financing terrorism by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Money laundering or financing terrorism As defined in Article 1 of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2005/60/EF of 26 October 2005 on preventive measures against the use of the financial system for money laundering and financing terrorism (EUT L 309 of 25.11.2005, p. 15). exg-crim-part Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted verdict of participation in a criminal organisation by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Participation in a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of the Council ́s framework decision 2008/841/RIA of 24 October 2008 on control of organised crime (EUT L 300 of 11.11.2008, p. 42) exg-crim-terror Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of acts of terrorism or criminal acts connected to terrorist activities by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Acts of terrorism or criminal acts relating to terrorist activity as defined in Article 1 and 3 of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/475/RIA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (EFT L 164, af 22.6.2002, p. 3). This rejection reason also includes incitement to, participation or attempts to commit such actions as included in Article 4 in the mentioned framework decision. exg-crim-traffick Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of child labour and other forms of human trafficking by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Child labour and other forms of human trafficking as defined in Article 2 of the European Parliament and council directive 2011/36/EU of 5. 1 April 2011 on the prevention and control of human trafficking and the protection of its victims and for compensation of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/629/RIA (EUT L 101 of 15.4.2011, p. 1). exg-mis-bre-env-law Is the tenderer aware of breaches of environmental provisions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. exg-mis-bre-lab-law Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on working conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. exg-mis-bre-soc-law Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on social conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. exg-mis-distortion Has the tenderer entered into agreement(s) with other tenderers with the intention of turning the competition? exg-mis-misconduct Has the tenderer committed serious errors in professional practice? If relevant, see the definitions in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents. exg-mis-misrepresent Have the tenderer:a) given grossly incorrect information when notifying the information required to verify that there is no basis for rejection, or of the qualification requirements being met,b) failed to provide such information,c) subject to immediately submitting the supporting documents requested by the Contracting Authority, ord) improperly affecting the Contracting Authority's decision process to acquire confidential information that could give this an unlawful advantage in connection with competition, or negligently has given misleading information that can have a significant influence on decisions on rejection, selection or award? exg-mis-partic-confl Are tenderers aware of a conflict of interest as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents? exg-mis-sanction Has the tenderer committed significant breaches of contract in connection with the fulfilment of a previous public contract, a previous contract with a public contracting authority or a previous concession contract, where the breach has led to the cancellation of the contract, compensation or other similar sanctions? exg-natl-bre-nat-law The contracting authority shall state that in Norway there are national rejection reasons. These shall be described in the procurement documents. Tenderers must respond to whether they are in one or more of the situations described in the national rejection reasons. Will the purely national rejection reasons, as stated in the relevant notice or in the procurement documents, apply? exg-pmt-bre-ssc Have tenderers failed to fulfil all their social security obligations in the country where they are established and in their member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in? exg-pmt-bre-tax Has the tenderer not fulfilled his tax and duty obligations in the country in which he is established, and in the contracting authority's member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in? exg-sitn-as-susp Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. exg-sitn-bankr Is the tenderer in a bankruptcy situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. exg-sitn-cred-arran Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. exg-sitn-insolvency Is the tenderer in an insolvency situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. exg-sitn-liq-admin Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. exg-sitn-other Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. epo-notice neg-w-call false R01630 ServiceNow The Norwegian Defence Estates Agency's ServiceNow cloud platform shall be continued and further developed. The Norwegian Defence Estates Agency shall establish ServiceNow on-premise on a closed/classified platform. The framework agreement will be for the establishment, development, management and maintenance of the on-premise platform. The contract shall support the Norwegian Defence Estates Agency as a business satisfying NSM's fundamental principles and see to other needs within the Enterprise Service Management. The framework agreement is exclusive. The framework agreement will be valid for 3 (three) years, with an option for an extension for up to 1 (one) year at a time, up to 4 (four) times, maximum duration of 7 (seven) years. Based on the current need, the framework agreement ́s estimated value, including all options is NOK 350,000,000 excluding VAT. Due to uncertainty connected to future defence policy and strategic choices, as well as financing, the maximum value of the framework agreement, including all options, is NOK 550,000,000 excluding VAT. The estimates do not represent any purchasing obligation for the Contracting Authority. The competition will be held in two stages. Tenderers who would like to participate in the competition must first submit a request to participate in the competition by the deadline stated in Mercell. Tenderers shall submit the requested information and documentation in accordance with point 11 in the document "Qualification Documentation (FOSA over EEA)". As this is a two stage procedure, a complete tender shall not be submitted for this stage in the competition. The tender documentation is attached. All qualification applications must be submitted electronically via the Mercell portal, www.mercell.no by the deadline for submission. It is recommended that the qualification application is delivered well before the deadline expires. If a tenderer would like to change the submitted qualification application, this can be done by opening the qualification application, making any changes and re-submitting it until the deadline expires. The last submitted qualification application is regarded as the final qualification application. Tenderers shall fill in the electronic self-declaration form (ESPD), which is incorporated as a part of the process when submission in Mercell. The Norwegian Defence Estates Agency draws attention to the fact that ESPD shall be delivered in certain cases from cooperating suppliers and from sub-suppliers. If it is stated in the tender documentation that the qualification requirements shall be documented (e.g. reference projects), the documentation must be uploaded in Mercell in a separate annex. services 72000000 72200000 72210000 72212000 72212200 72212400 72220000 72222300 72246000 72260000 72266000 73220000 anyw-cou NOR LOT-0000 false shar-subc not-allowed false NOR 261046744 non-restricted-document https://permalink.mercell.com/261046744.aspx Based on the current need, the framework agreement ́s estimated value, including all options is NOK 350,000,000 excluding VAT. Due to uncertainty connected to future defence policy and strategic choices, as well as financing, the maximum value of the framework agreement, including all options, is NOK 550,000,000 excluding VAT. The estimates do not represent any obligation to purchase for the Contracting Authority. epo-procurement-document none false subc-chng no true performance See the qualification documentation point 1.1. https://permalink.mercell.com/261046744.aspx The deadlines are in accordance with the regulations. ORG-0002 NOR required 2025-08-25+00:00 10:00:00+00:00 true 5 false 1 fa-wo-rc R01630 ServiceNow The Norwegian Defence Estates Agency's ServiceNow cloud platform shall be continued and further developed. The Norwegian Defence Estates Agency shall establish ServiceNow on-premise on a closed/classified platform. The framework agreement will be for the establishment, development, management and maintenance of the on-premise platform. The contract shall support the Norwegian Defence Estates Agency as a business satisfying NSM's fundamental principles and see to other needs within the Enterprise Service Management. The framework agreement is exclusive. The framework agreement will be valid for 3 (three) years, with an option for an extension for up to 1 (one) year at a time, up to 4 (four) times, maximum duration of 7 (seven) years. Based on the current need, the framework agreement ́s estimated value, including all options is NOK 350,000,000 excluding VAT. Due to uncertainty connected to future defence policy and strategic choices, as well as financing, the maximum value of the framework agreement, including all options, is NOK 550,000,000 excluding VAT. The estimates do not represent any purchasing obligation for the Contracting Authority. The competition will be held in two stages. Tenderers who would like to participate in the competition must first submit a request to participate in the competition by the deadline stated in Mercell. Tenderers shall submit the requested information and documentation in accordance with point 11 in the document "Qualification Documentation (FOSA over EEA)". As this is a two stage procedure, a complete tender shall not be submitted for this stage in the competition. The tender documentation is attached. All qualification applications must be submitted electronically via the Mercell portal, www.mercell.no by the deadline for submission. It is recommended that the qualification application is delivered well before the deadline expires. If a tenderer would like to change the submitted qualification application, this can be done by opening the qualification application, making any changes and re-submitting it until the deadline expires. The last submitted qualification application is regarded as the final qualification application. Tenderers shall fill in the electronic self-declaration form (ESPD), which is incorporated as a part of the process when submission in Mercell. The Norwegian Defence Estates Agency draws attention to the fact that ESPD shall be delivered in certain cases from cooperating suppliers and from sub-suppliers. If it is stated in the tender documentation that the qualification requirements shall be documented (e.g. reference projects), the documentation must be uploaded in Mercell in a separate annex. services 72000000 72200000 72210000 72212000 72212200 72212400 72220000 72222300 72246000 72260000 72266000 73220000 anyw-cou NOR 7 4 The framework agreement will be valid for 3 (three) years, with an option for an extension for up to 1 (one) year at a time, up to 4 (four) times, maximum duration of 7 (seven) years.