2025-10-29+00:00 08:53:37+00:00 c5545d84-7934-47f9-ad76-8431203b9208-02 PROCEDURE LOT-0000 cor-pub Deadlines have been corrected due to technical difficulties. 16 ORG-0001 OFA IKS Kjøita 40 OFA IKS Kristiansand 4630 NO092 NOR 931832336 Synnøve Skårdal +47 91555060 Synnove.Torgersen.Skardal@ofa-iks.no ORG-0002 Agder Tingrett kristiansand 4614 NO092 NOR 926 723 480 00717304-2025209/20252025-10-30+01:00 2.3 eforms-sdk-1.13 579877f4-f3e2-47ef-90ae-9693df6fd5c6 e572179d-df38-45db-afbe-04d8f23f6c14 2025-10-29+00:00 08:47:20+00:00 01 2025-10-30Z 32014L0024 cn-standard ENG https://eu.eu-supply.com/ctm/company/companyinformation/index/311790 body-pl-la pub-os ORG-0001 exg-crim-corrpt Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a enforceable verdict has been convicted of corruption by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on Combating Corruption, Involving European Communities or European Union Member States (EUT C 195 of 25.6.1997, s. 1), and in Article 2, point 1, in the Council ́s framework decision 2003/568/RIA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (EUT L 192 of 31.7.2003, p. 54). This rejection reason also includes corruption as defined in national law for the contracting authority or supplier. exg-crim-fraud Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted of fraud has been convicted of fraud by a verdict handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Fraud included in Article 1 of the Convention on protection of the Financial Interests of the European Communities (EFT C 316 of 27.11.1995, p. 48). exg-crim-laund Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of money laundering or financing terrorism by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Money laundering or financing terrorism As defined in Article 1 of the European Parliament and Council Directive 2005/60/EF of 26 October 2005 on preventive measures against the use of the financial system for money laundering and financing terrorism (EUT L 309 of 25.11.2005, p. 15). exg-crim-part Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, at the time a legally convicted verdict of participation in a criminal organisation by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Participation in a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of the Council ́s framework decision 2008/841/RIA of 24 October 2008 on control of organised crime (EUT L 300 of 11.11.2008, p. 42) exg-crim-terror Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body, or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of acts of terrorism or criminal acts connected to terrorist activities by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period set out directly in the judgement that still applies? Acts of terrorism or criminal acts relating to terrorist activity as defined in Article 1 and 3 of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/475/RIA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (EFT L 164, af 22.6.2002, p. 3). This rejection reason also includes incitement to, participation or attempts to commit such actions as included in Article 4 in the mentioned framework decision. exg-crim-traffick Is the tenderer himself or a person, who is a member of the tenderer's administration, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, in the event a legal verdict has been convicted of child labour and other forms of human trafficking by a verdict handed down no more than five years ago, or a rejection period determined directly in the judgement that still applies? Child labour and other forms of human trafficking as defined in Article 2 of the European Parliament and council directive 2011/36/EU of 5. 1 April 2011 on the prevention and control of human trafficking and the protection of its victims and for compensation of the Council ́s framework decision 2002/629/RIA (EUT L 101 of 15.4.2011, p. 1). exg-mis-bre-env-law Is the tenderer aware of breaches of environmental provisions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. exg-mis-bre-lab-law Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on working conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. exg-mis-bre-soc-law Is the tenderer aware of breaches of provisions on social conditions as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU. exg-mis-distortion Has the tenderer entered into agreement(s) with other tenderers with the intention of turning the competition? exg-mis-misconduct Has the tenderer committed serious errors in professional practice? If relevant, see the definitions in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents. exg-mis-misrepresent Have the tenderer:a) given grossly incorrect information when notifying the information required to verify that there is no basis for rejection, or of the qualification requirements being met,b) failed to provide such information,c) subject to immediately submitting the supporting documents requested by the Contracting Authority, ord) improperly affecting the Contracting Authority's decision process to acquire confidential information that could give this an unlawful advantage in connection with competition, or negligently has given misleading information that can have a significant influence on decisions on rejection, selection or award? exg-mis-partic-confl Are tenderers aware of a conflict of interest as stated in national law, the relevant notice or procurement documents? exg-mis-prep-confl Has the tenderer or an entity associated with the supplier advised the contracting authority or in another way been involved in the planning of the competition? exg-mis-sanction Has the tenderer committed significant breaches of contract in connection with the fulfilment of a previous public contract, a previous contract with a public contracting authority or a previous concession contract, where the breach has led to the cancellation of the contract, compensation or other similar sanctions? exg-pmt-bre-ssc Have tenderers failed to fulfil all their social security obligations in the country where they are established and in their member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in? exg-pmt-bre-tax Has the tenderer not fulfilled his tax and duty obligations in the country in which he is established, and in the contracting authority's member state, if this is a different country than what he is established in? exg-sitn-as-susp Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. exg-sitn-bankr Is the tenderer in a bankruptcy situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. exg-sitn-cred-arran Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. exg-sitn-insolvency Is the tenderer in an insolvency situation? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. exg-sitn-liq-admin Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. exg-sitn-other Is the supplier in a situation where he has been forced debt arrangement? Specify why, under the mentioned circumstances, one is able to carry out the contract, considering the current national provisions and measures for continuing the business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if rejection of tenderers made mandatory in accordance with the current national law without the possibility for exceptions. epo-sub-espd epo-notice epo-procurement-document The procurement will be made in accordance with the current Law 17 June 2016 no. 73 on public procurements (LOA) and the regulations 12 August 2016 no. 97x on public procurements (FOA) parts I and III. The procurement will be carried out as a negotiated procedure after a prior notice, cf. the Public Procurement Regulations § 13-1 (2). This competition is initiated with a qualification phase (phase 1). Only tenderers who fulfil the qualification requirements and who are invited will be able to submit a tender (phase 2). The contracting authority ́s assessment is that the conditions for the chosen procedure form are met cf. the Public Procurement Regulations §13-2(c). The procurement is for a technical complex software system that shall be adapted to the existing and future multi-function machines (MFP) and different ICT environments in the OFA cooperation. It is necessary to conduct negotiations to clarify the technical and functional conditions. neg-w-call false 2025/12 Software and system for secure printing and scanning. The objective of the procurement is to cover the OFA companies ́need for software and a system for secure printing and scanning for all users. The system shall contribute to standardising and making printing and scanning solutions more efficient in the OFA cooperation and supporting joint ICT strategy and security requirements. The software shall be easy to use for final users and easy to operate for key personnel, while facilitating resource and cost efficient operation. The system shall optimise the use of existing servers. There are requirements for cooperation between the software supplier, suppliers of multi-function machines (MFP) and the ICT departments in the OFA cooperation. The ICT operations are largely centralised, facilitating an efficient implementation and follow-up of the system. The procurement does not include physical hardware (MFP), but the software shall support existing and upcoming MFP deliveries through standardised interface and authentication systems. The system shall be flexible and adaptable to changes in the machinery, infrastructure and organisation of ICT services in the contract period. The aim is to establish a secure, user friendly, functional and cost efficient print system that requires minimal local administration and efficient interaction across the OFA companies. services The following contracting authorities are participating in this contract: DDV IKS, IKT Agder IKS, Kristiansand municipality. Option: Birkenes/Lillesand 60000000 72500000 30200000 48770000 48773000 48824000 48900000 72510000 Agder anyw-cou NOR LOT-0000 slc-stand-other Requirement: Tenderers shall have sufficient economic and financial capacity to fulfil the contract. The required financial capacity will be assessed in relation to the contract ́s value, services, risk and duration. Documentation requirement: The contracting authority will obtain a credit rating of the tenderer itself. The contracting authority reserves the right to obtain supplementary information on the tenderer's finances Note: If the tenderer has a justifiable reason, they can document their economic and financial capacity by presenting other relevant documentation. true slc-abil-staff-tech-ctrl Requirement: Tenderers shall have experience from comparable contracts. Documentation requirement: Description of the tenderer's three most relevant contracts in the course of the last three years. The description must include a statement of the contracting authority, gender neutral preferred with telephone and email, date of execution, value/extent as well as a description of the delivery. It is the tenderer ́s responsibility to document relevance through the description. Annex 1 can be used. true slc-sche-qu-cert-indep Requirement: Tenderers shall have implemented and functioning quality assurance systems. Documentation requirement: Description of the company's quality assurance system that is implemented in the company. If a tenderer is certified in accordance with ISO 9001 or equivalent third-party verified systems, it is sufficient to enclose a copy of a valid certificate. false slc-suit-reg-trade Requirement: Tenderers shall be registered in a company register, professional register or a commerce register in the country where the tenderer is established. Documentation requirement: • Norwegian companies: Company Registration Certificate • Foreign companies: Proof that the company is registered in a company register, professional register or a commerce register in the country where the tenderer is established. false not-allowed no-eu-funds par-requ not-allowed false NOR Anskaffelsesdokumenter non-restricted-document https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=443698&B= none epo-notice false required false no not-allowed true per-exa 50 price Price Documentation: Complete Annex 6 Annex 1 Price Form. Evaluation: Total sum per-exa 10 quality Service and support Documentation: Describe the primary contact persons ́ competence in "Annex 2 The tenderer ́s solution description" of up to 2 pages. Evaluation: The contracting authority would like competent primary contacts for support, for example 1-3 persons. The support contacts will be assessed based on experience and competence with the offered software, and experience with connecting to different types of multi-function machines. The effect of the competence is to reduce administrative use of resources and error messages. The evaluation will be based on the procuremental judgement and perceived value. This will give a positive rating if the responses are clear and binding. The contracting authority reserves the right to assess the described competence through a test of the software and/or by questions or cases in any round of negotiations. The test and any questions will only include the conditions described in the tender. per-exa 5 quality Further functionality in the system Documentation: Describe the additional offered functionality in "Annex 2 the Tenderer ́s solution description" of up to 2 pages. Evaluation: Additional functionality in the software solution than what is described. With a focus on efficiency possibilities, user friendliness and technically good solutions for common problems within the area, for example, document handling and integrations. The offered functionality does not incur extra costs. The evaluation will be based on the procuremental judgement and perceived value. This will give a positive rating if the responses are clear and binding. We reserve the right to use tests to verify and evaluate the responses. per-exa 10 quality Authentication Documentation: Describe the authentication system in "Annex 2 The tenderer ́s solution description" of up to 2 pages. If integration with the existing system is not possible without further adaptation or additional hardware, the supplier shall state In the price form a total price for the complete delivery, including all the necessary adaptations and installation, so that the software can be used. Evaluation: We would like a future orientated, standardised and good authentication system, where the current installed card readers and ID cards are to be used further. We will assess the authentication based on how user-friendly it is, for both administrators and final users. Users with multiple access cards would like a simple system to be automatically identified at the right location without the need for manual registration/maintenance from the administrator. Describe user friendly methods for alternative log-ins (QR code, disposable code, mobile client etc.) for printing. The evaluation will be based on the procuremental judgement and perceived value. This will give a positive rating if the responses are clear and binding. We reserve the right to use tests to verify and evaluate the responses. per-exa 25 quality Testing the implementation, functionality and user friendliness of the software. Documentation: Tenderers shall describe in "Annex 2 The tenderer ́s solution description" of how the system is implemented and administered in the contracting authority ́s environment, including: • Recommended delivery model (on-prem, hybrid, cloud) and justification. • Server park requirements within the current possibilities (number of servers, capacity need). • Preparations before tests (doors, services, resources that must be opened). Evaluation: The contracting authority is setting up the test environment. The tenderer shall provide the necessary documentation and assist as needed. The test shall cover: • Installation and start-up: Simply how the system is set up in the existing environment. • Administration: How much manual effort is required and how tasks can be automated. • User experience: Sign in (card, QR, mobile), printing, scanning, guest system. • Life cycle for a device: Add, manage, and remove a printer. • Training: How key personnel get the necessary competence. The list is not exhaustive and testing the system will be seen against the aim of the contract. Roles: • Contracting authority (ICT cooperation): Facilitates the test environment, carries out tests, documents finds. • Supplier: Provides the necessary documentation, provides access to software and answers questions during tests. The contracting authority assesses how realistic and future orientated the system is, to what degree it streamlines the need for local server parks, reduces the degree of manual administration and where user friendly implementation, operation and system appear. The evaluation will be based on a general perspective from both users and administrators. https://eu.eu-supply.com/app/rfq/rwlentrance_s.asp?PID=443698&B= ORG-0001 ORG-0001 After the choice of tenderer(s) has been made, all involved tenderers will be informed in writing. The notification will include the name of the chosen tenderer, an account of the chosen tender ́s qualities and relative advantages in accordance with the award criteria, as well as the date of the waiting period, cf. the Public Procurement Regulations § 25-1. The contracting authority will not enter into a contract until the waiting period has expired, cf. the Public Procurement Regulations § 25-2. If there are appeals before the waiting period expires, the contract will not be signed until the complaint is dealt with, cf. the Public Procurement Regulations § 25-3. ORG-0002 NOR false true false required true true 2025-11-26+00:00 11:00:00+00:00 2025-11-11+00:00 15:00:00+00:00 true 3 3 false none none 2025/12 Software and system for secure printing and scanning. The objective of the procurement is to cover the OFA companies ́need for software and a system for secure printing and scanning for all users. The system shall contribute to standardising and making printing and scanning solutions more efficient in the OFA cooperation and supporting joint ICT strategy and security requirements. The software shall be easy to use for final users and easy to operate for key personnel, while facilitating resource and cost efficient operation. The system shall optimise the use of existing servers. There are requirements for cooperation between the software supplier, suppliers of multi-function machines (MFP) and the ICT departments in the OFA cooperation. The ICT operations are largely centralised, facilitating an efficient implementation and follow-up of the system. The procurement does not include physical hardware (MFP), but the software shall support existing and upcoming MFP deliveries through standardised interface and authentication systems. The system shall be flexible and adaptable to changes in the machinery, infrastructure and organisation of ICT services in the contract period. The aim is to establish a secure, user friendly, functional and cost efficient print system that requires minimal local administration and efficient interaction across the OFA companies. services The following contracting authorities are participating in this contract: DDV IKS, IKT Agder IKS, Kristiansand municipality. Option: Birkenes/Lillesand 60000000 72500000 30200000 48770000 48773000 48824000 48900000 72510000 Agder anyw-cou NOR 2 Birkenes/Lillesand IKT cooperation is on option for the contract. 6 Option for the contract period: 1+1+1+1+1+1+1 Total 8 years.