5.1.1.
Föremålet för upphandlingen
Kontraktets art: Tjänster
Huvudklassificering (cpv): 90700000 Miljötjänster
5.1.2.
Leveransplats
Var som helst
Kompletterande information: Asia
5.1.5.
Värde
Beräknat värde exklusive moms: 880 000,00 EUR
5.1.6.
Allmänna upplysningar
Upphandlingsprojekt som inte finansieras med EU-medel
Upphandlingen omfattas av Världshandelsorganisationens avtal om offentlig upphandling, GPA: nej
5.1.7.
Strategisk upphandling
Syftet med strategisk upphandling: Minskning av miljöpåverkan
Beskrivning: -
Metod som ska minska miljöpåverkan: Anpassning till klimatförändringar, Förebyggande och begränsning av miljöföroreningar, Omställning till en cirkulär ekonomi, Begränsning av klimatförändringar
5.1.10.
Tilldelningskriterier
Kriterium:
Typ: Kvalitet
Namn: Criterion 1 - Number of Facilities Managed
Beskrivning: 3 points: Experience managing ≥3 blended finance facilities of comparable scope to RAIF (e.g., facilities involving multiple countries, diverse financial instruments, public-private collaboration, and climate or adaptation focus), demonstrating exceptional breadth and depth. • 2 points: Experience managing ≥2 relevant facilities with demonstrated complexity (e.g., multi-instrument structures, regional reach, or catalytic finance objectives), showing strong capability. • 1 point: Experience managing 1 blended finance facility with clear relevance to the RAIF mandate (e.g., climate finance, risk-sharing, or SME/MSME support in emerging markets), meeting core requirements. • 0 points: Experience managing 1 facility that partially meets RAIF requirements (e.g., smaller scale, single-country, or limited instrument diversity) but demonstrates fundamental facility management capability.
Kategori av tilldelningskriteriet vikt: Viktning (poängtal, exakt)
Sifferangivelse för tilldelningskriterium: 1
Kriterium:
Typ: Kvalitet
Namn: Criterion 2 - Documented Catalysation of Public and Private Capital
Beskrivning: 3 points: Catalysed ≥EUR 200 million across climate-focused or comparable instruments, with documented evidence (e.g., signed co-financing agreements, investor commitments, or audited reports). • 2 points: Catalysed ≥EUR 100 million, with verifiable documentation demonstrating public and/or private capital mobilisation. • 1 point: Catalysed ≥EUR 50 million, with supporting documentation (e.g., investor letters, project financing close reports, or annual reports). • 0 points: Catalysed less than EUR 20 million, or limited documentation provided.
Kategori av tilldelningskriteriet vikt: Viktning (poängtal, exakt)
Sifferangivelse för tilldelningskriterium: 2
Kriterium:
Typ: Kvalitet
Namn: Criterion 3 - Types of Instruments Deployed
Beskrivning: 3 points: Deployed ≥4 types of instruments (e.g., first-loss capital, guarantees, FX hedging, green bonds) across multiple projects or facilities, with documented outcomes, demonstrating exceptional diversity and sophistication. • 2 points: Deployed ≥3 types of de-risking tools, with evidence of successful implementation and impact, showing strong capability. • 1 point: Deployed ≥2 types of de-risking tools (including at least one of: first-loss, guarantees, or similar risk-sharing mechanism), with documented application in relevant contexts. • 0 points: Deployed at least one first-loss or guarantee mechanism with documented application, meeting minimum instrument structuring requirements. • In order for SEI to make a correct assessment of Criterion 3, the tenderer shall
Kategori av tilldelningskriteriet vikt: Viktning (poängtal, exakt)
Sifferangivelse för tilldelningskriterium: 3
Kriterium:
Typ: Kvalitet
Namn: Criterion 4 - Catalysation Pathway
Beskrivning: 3 points: Clear monthly/quarterly targets toward EUR 250 million, with quantified milestones for each instrument type, country, and investor segment. Includes contingency planning and assumptions. • 2 points: Quarterly benchmarks toward the target, with milestones included and reasonable sequencing of capital mobilisation activities. • 1 point: Annual targets stated, but weak quantification or limited detail on sequencing and milestones. 0 points: No clear targets or quantifiable roadmap; generic statements without measurable objectives.
Kategori av tilldelningskriteriet vikt: Viktning (poängtal, exakt)
Sifferangivelse för tilldelningskriterium: 4
Kriterium:
Typ: Kvalitet
Namn: Criterion 5 - Investor Engagement Plan
Beskrivning: points: Comprehensive strategy targeting ≥10 private and ≥6 public institutional investors, with clear tools, sequencing, and timelines. Includes investor-specific value propositions and engagement tactics. • 2 points: Strong plan targeting ≥6 private and ≥3 public investors, with an indicative roadmap and engagement tools specified. • 1 point: Generic plan with named investors, but lacking a detailed timeline, tools, or sequencing. • 0 points: Minimal plan; no specific investor targeting tools or timeline provided.
Kategori av tilldelningskriteriet vikt: Viktning (poängtal, exakt)
Sifferangivelse för tilldelningskriterium: 5
Kriterium:
Typ: Kvalitet
Namn: Criterion 6 - Risk Management Coverage
Beskrivning: points: Risk systems comprehensively cover all 7 categories as per Annex 1(Assignment Description), with documented frameworks, implementation evidence, and examples of risk mitigation in comparable projects, demonstrating exceptional comprehensiveness. • 2 points: Risk systems cover ≥5 categories, with clear evidence of implementation and monitoring in previous facilities or projects, showing strong capability. • 1 point: Risk systems cover ≥4 categories, with documented frameworks and some evidence of implementation. • 0 points: Risk systems cover ≥3 categories with documented policies and procedures, meeting minimum framework requirements.
Kategori av tilldelningskriteriet vikt: Viktning (poängtal, exakt)
Sifferangivelse för tilldelningskriterium: 6
Kriterium:
Typ: Kvalitet
Namn: Criterion 7 - Investor Relationships
Beskrivning: 3 points: ≥10 institutional investors engaged in co-financing or collaboration, with documented evidence (e.g., co-investment agreements, letters of support, or joint project references). • 2 points: ≥5 investor relationships with documented collaboration on relevant projects or facilities. • 1 point: ≥3 investor/donor relationships noted, with some evidence of engagement or collaboration. • 0 points: ≥1 investor/donor relationship mentioned, or relationships in development.
Kategori av tilldelningskriteriet vikt: Viktning (poängtal, exakt)
Sifferangivelse för tilldelningskriterium: 7
Kriterium:
Typ: Kvalitet
Namn: Criterion 8 - IFC Performance Standards Compliance
Beskrivning: 3 points: Certified under IFC Performance Standards, with certification year provided and evidence of ongoing compliance monitoring, representing gold standard implementation. • 2 points: Documented internal alignment with IFC PS, with partial application demonstrated through safeguards policies, training programs, or external reviews, showing robust implementation. • 1 point: Policies and procedures aligned with IFC PS and systematically applied in operations, with evidence of integration into decision-making and monitoring processes, meeting strong alignment standards. • 0 points: Basic alignment with IFC PS demonstrated through organisational policies or procedures, with some evidence of application in projects, meeting minimum alignment requirements.
Kategori av tilldelningskriteriet vikt: Viktning (poängtal, exakt)
Sifferangivelse för tilldelningskriterium: 8
Kriterium:
Typ: Kvalitet
Namn: Criterion 9 - Project with ESG/GESI Safeguards
Beskrivning: points: ≥90% of projects have externally or internally verified ESG/GESI safeguards, with documented evidence (e.g., safeguards reports, audit findings, or donor reviews), demonstrating exceptional consistency and rigor. • 2 points: ≥75% of projects have verified safeguards (internal/external), with clear documentation of safeguards systems and compliance, showing strong performance. • 1 point: ≥60% of projects have documented safeguard systems or policies in place, with evidence of systematic application and monitoring. • 0 points: ≥50% of projects have basic safeguard procedures in place, meeting minimum systematic integration requirements.
Kategori av tilldelningskriteriet vikt: Viktning (poängtal, exakt)
Sifferangivelse för tilldelningskriterium: 9
5.1.15.
Metoder
Ramavtal:
Upphandlingen avser inte ett ramavtal
Information om det dynamiska inköpssystemet:
Upphandlingen avser inte ett dynamiskt inköpssystem
5.1.16.
Kompletterande information, medling och prövning
Prövningsorganisation: Förvaltningsrätten
Information om tidsfrist för prövning: -
Organisation som undertecknar kontraktet: Stift The Stockholm Environment Institute Sei