Servizzi - 10374-2021

12/01/2021    S7

Lithuania-Vilnius: Provision of Online Services

2021/S 007-010374

Corrigendum

Notice for changes or additional information

Services

(Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, 2020/S 241-595022)

Legal Basis:
Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2018/1046

Section I: Contracting authority/entity

I.1)Name and addresses
Official name: European Institute for Gender Equality
National registration number: 2900764882
Postal address: Gedimino av.16
Town: Vilnius
NUTS code: LT011 Vilniaus apskritis
Postal code: LT 01103
Country: Lithuania
E-mail: procurement@eige.europa.eu
Internet address(es):
Main address: www.eige.europa.eu

Section II: Object

II.1)Scope of the procurement
II.1.1)Title:

Provision of Online Services

Reference number: FWC EIGE/2020/OPER/08
II.1.2)Main CPV code
72220000 Systems and technical consultancy services
II.1.3)Type of contract
Services
II.1.4)Short description:

The objective of this procedure is to conclude a framework contracts with professional companies capable of providing a large range of services related to consultation, analysis, design and implementation of websites, intranets and online tools, particularly on Drupal and Microsoft SharePoint. The framework contracts will cover EIGE’s needs on web development for internal and external target audiences for the period 2021-2024.

Section VI: Complementary information

VI.5)Date of dispatch of this notice:
07/01/2021
VI.6)Original notice reference
Notice number in the OJ S: 2020/S 241-595022

Section VII: Changes

VII.1)Information to be changed or added
VII.1.2)Text to be corrected in the original notice
Section number: II.2.5)
Lot No: 1
Place of text to be modified: Award criteria
Instead of:

Quality criterion: name: quality of the methodological approach/weighting: 24

Quality criterion: name: quality control measures/weighting: 22

Quality criterion: name: organisation of work and resources/weighting: 22

Quality criterion: name: approach to the relevant scenario/weighting: 32

Price: weighting: 40 %.

Read:

Quality criterion: name: quality of the methodological approach/weighting: 24

Quality criterion: name: quality control measures/weighting: 22

Quality criterion: name: organisation of work and resources/weighting: 22

Quality criterion: name: approach to the relevant scenario/weighting: 32

Price: weighting: 40 %. the evaluation of financial offers is based on the following formula, which applies weights on all costs indicated:

Lot 1: price of tender = (0.05*A) + (0.18*B) + (0.17*C) + (0.30*D) + (0.07*E) + (0.15*F) + (0.05*G) + (0.02*H) + (0.01*J).

Section number: II.2.5)
Lot No: 2
Place of text to be modified: Award criteria
Instead of:

Criteria below

Quality criterion: name: quality of the methodological approach/weighting: 24

Quality criterion: name: quality control measures/weighting: 22

Quality criterion: name: organisation of work and resources/weighting: 22

Quality criterion: name: approach to the relevant scenario/weighting: 32

Price: weighting: 40 %.

Read:

Criteria below

Quality criterion: name: quality of the methodological approach/weighting: 24

Quality criterion: name: quality control measures/weighting: 22

Quality criterion: name: organisation of work and resources/weighting: 22

Quality criterion: name: approach to the relevant scenario/weighting: 32

Price: weighting: 40 %. Lot 2: price of tender = (0.05*A) + (0.18*B) + (0.21*C) + (0.34*D) + (0.05*I) + (0.08*F) + (0.08*G) + (0.01*J).

Section number: II.2.5)
Lot No: 3
Place of text to be modified: Award criteria
Instead of:

Criteria below

Quality criterion: name: quality of the methodological approach/weighting: 24

Quality criterion: name: quality control measures/weighting: 22

Quality criterion: name: organisation of work and resources/weighting: 22

Quality criterion: name: approach to the relevant scenario/weighting: 32

Price: weighting: 40 %.

Read:

Criteria below

Quality criterion: name: quality of the methodological approach/weighting: 24

Quality criterion: name: quality control measures/weighting: 22

Quality criterion: name: organisation of work and resources/weighting: 22

Quality criterion: name: approach to the relevant scenario/weighting: 32

Price: weighting: 40 %. Lot 3: Price of tender = (0.10*A) + (0.30*B) + (0.20*C) + (0.15*F) + (0.15*G) + (0.10*J)

Section number: II.2.5)
Lot No: 1;2;3
Place of text to be modified: Award criteria
Instead of:

Technical Specifications section 3.2 B:

‘<>Where:

A = Daily rate of the project manager,

B = Daily rate of the senior analyst,

C = Daily rate of the senior web/SharePoint developer,

D = Daily rate of the junior web/SharePoint developer,

E = Daily rate of the database administrator,

F = Daily rate of the web designer,

G = Daily rate of the quality manager,

H = Daily rate of the editor,

I = Attendance cost of 1 expert from the contractor’s side to a day meeting in Vilnius – fees not included’.

Read:

Technical Specifications section 3.2 B:

‘<>Where:A = Daily rate of the project manager,

B = Daily rate of the senior analyst,

C = Daily rate of the senior web/SharePoint developer,

D = Daily rate of the junior web/SharePoint developer,

E = Daily rate of the database administrator,

F = Daily rate of the web designer,

G = Daily rate of the quality manager,

H = Daily rate of the editor,

I = Office 365 Solution Architect

J= Attendance cost of 1 expert from the contractor’s side to a day meeting in Vilnius – fees not included’.

VII.2)Other additional information:

Standard submission forms: financial offer table to be updated accordingly:

Project manager A

Senior analyst B

Senior web developer C

Junior web developer D

Database administrator E

Web designer F

Quality manager G

Editor H

Office 365 Solution Architect I

Other costs

Attendance cost of 1 expert (from the contractor’s side) to a day meeting in Vilnius – fees not included J.