VII.1.2)Text to be corrected in the original noticeSection number: II.2.5)
Lot No: 1
Place of text to be modified: Award criteria
Instead of:
Quality criterion: name: quality of the methodological approach/weighting: 24
Quality criterion: name: quality control measures/weighting: 22
Quality criterion: name: organisation of work and resources/weighting: 22
Quality criterion: name: approach to the relevant scenario/weighting: 32
Price: weighting: 40 %.
Read:
Quality criterion: name: quality of the methodological approach/weighting: 24
Quality criterion: name: quality control measures/weighting: 22
Quality criterion: name: organisation of work and resources/weighting: 22
Quality criterion: name: approach to the relevant scenario/weighting: 32
Price: weighting: 40 %. the evaluation of financial offers is based on the following formula, which applies weights on all costs indicated:
Lot 1: price of tender = (0.05*A) + (0.18*B) + (0.17*C) + (0.30*D) + (0.07*E) + (0.15*F) + (0.05*G) + (0.02*H) + (0.01*J).
Section number: II.2.5)
Lot No: 2
Place of text to be modified: Award criteria
Instead of:
Criteria below
Quality criterion: name: quality of the methodological approach/weighting: 24
Quality criterion: name: quality control measures/weighting: 22
Quality criterion: name: organisation of work and resources/weighting: 22
Quality criterion: name: approach to the relevant scenario/weighting: 32
Price: weighting: 40 %.
Read:
Criteria below
Quality criterion: name: quality of the methodological approach/weighting: 24
Quality criterion: name: quality control measures/weighting: 22
Quality criterion: name: organisation of work and resources/weighting: 22
Quality criterion: name: approach to the relevant scenario/weighting: 32
Price: weighting: 40 %. Lot 2: price of tender = (0.05*A) + (0.18*B) + (0.21*C) + (0.34*D) + (0.05*I) + (0.08*F) + (0.08*G) + (0.01*J).
Section number: II.2.5)
Lot No: 3
Place of text to be modified: Award criteria
Instead of:
Criteria below
Quality criterion: name: quality of the methodological approach/weighting: 24
Quality criterion: name: quality control measures/weighting: 22
Quality criterion: name: organisation of work and resources/weighting: 22
Quality criterion: name: approach to the relevant scenario/weighting: 32
Price: weighting: 40 %.
Read:
Criteria below
Quality criterion: name: quality of the methodological approach/weighting: 24
Quality criterion: name: quality control measures/weighting: 22
Quality criterion: name: organisation of work and resources/weighting: 22
Quality criterion: name: approach to the relevant scenario/weighting: 32
Price: weighting: 40 %. Lot 3: Price of tender = (0.10*A) + (0.30*B) + (0.20*C) + (0.15*F) + (0.15*G) + (0.10*J)
Section number: II.2.5)
Lot No: 1;2;3
Place of text to be modified: Award criteria
Instead of:
Technical Specifications section 3.2 B:
‘<>Where:
A = Daily rate of the project manager,
B = Daily rate of the senior analyst,
C = Daily rate of the senior web/SharePoint developer,
D = Daily rate of the junior web/SharePoint developer,
E = Daily rate of the database administrator,
F = Daily rate of the web designer,
G = Daily rate of the quality manager,
H = Daily rate of the editor,
I = Attendance cost of 1 expert from the contractor’s side to a day meeting in Vilnius – fees not included’.
Read:
Technical Specifications section 3.2 B:
‘<>Where:A = Daily rate of the project manager,
B = Daily rate of the senior analyst,
C = Daily rate of the senior web/SharePoint developer,
D = Daily rate of the junior web/SharePoint developer,
E = Daily rate of the database administrator,
F = Daily rate of the web designer,
G = Daily rate of the quality manager,
H = Daily rate of the editor,
I = Office 365 Solution Architect
J= Attendance cost of 1 expert from the contractor’s side to a day meeting in Vilnius – fees not included’.