Check out our COVID-19 dedicated page for tenders related to medical equipment needs.

The Conference on the Future of Europe is your chance to share your ideas and shape the future of Europe. Make your voice heard!

Services - 280756-2020

16/06/2020    S115

United Kingdom-York: Refuse and waste related services

2020/S 115-280756

Contract notice – utilities

Services

Legal Basis:
Directive 2014/25/EU

Section I: Contracting entity

I.1)Name and addresses
Official name: London North Eastern Railway Ltd
National registration number: 04659712
Postal address: East Coast House, 25 Skeldergate
Town: York
NUTS code: UK UNITED KINGDOM
Postal code: YO1 6DH
Country: United Kingdom
Contact person: Sharon Dodds
E-mail: tenders@lner.co.uk
Telephone: +44 7885983535
Internet address(es):
Main address: www.lner.co.uk
Address of the buyer profile: https://supplierlive.proactisp2p.com/Account/Login
I.3)Communication
The procurement documents are available for unrestricted and full direct access, free of charge, at: https://supplierlive.proactisp2p.com/Account/Login
Additional information can be obtained from the abovementioned address
Tenders or requests to participate must be submitted electronically via: https://supplierlive.proactisp2p.com/Account/Login
I.6)Main activity
Railway services

Section II: Object

II.1)Scope of the procurement
II.1.1)Title:

Waste Management Services

Reference number: ST1000047
II.1.2)Main CPV code
90500000 Refuse and waste related services
II.1.3)Type of contract
Services
II.1.4)Short description:

LNER invites your submission of a tender to provide waste management services in accordance with the conditions detailed in the attached documents. The waste services contract covers the route of Aberdeen to Peterborough, comprising of 11 Stations, 1 HQ and 1 depot.

The aim of this tender process is to select one or multiple suppliers with whom to sign an agreement for the duration of 4 years for the provision of the above mentioned services.

II.1.5)Estimated total value
Value excluding VAT: 920 000.00 GBP
II.1.6)Information about lots
This contract is divided into lots: yes
Tenders may be submitted for maximum number of lots: 3
Maximum number of lots that may be awarded to one tenderer: 1
II.2)Description
II.2.1)Title:

Lot 1: Stations and HQ

Lot No: 1
II.2.2)Additional CPV code(s)
34928480 Waste and rubbish containers and bins
44613800 Containers for waste material
II.2.3)Place of performance
NUTS code: UK UNITED KINGDOM
II.2.4)Description of the procurement:

LNER invites your submission of a tender to provide waste management services in accordance with the conditions detailed in the attached documents. The waste services contract covers the route of Aberdeen to Peterborough, comprising of 11 Stations, 1 HQ

The aim of this tender process is to select one or multiple suppliers with whom to sign an agreement for the duration of 4 years for the provision of the above mentioned services.

II.2.5)Award criteria
Price is not the only award criterion and all criteria are stated only in the procurement documents
II.2.6)Estimated value
Value excluding VAT: 720 000.00 GBP
II.2.7)Duration of the contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system
Start: 04/02/2021
This contract is subject to renewal: yes
Description of renewals:

We are looking to secure a 4-year contract, commencing 4 March 2021 with the option to extend for a further year for the collection and disposal of waste management for our stations, HQ and depot.

II.2.9)Information about the limits on the number of candidates to be invited
Envisaged minimum number: 3
Maximum number: 5
Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:

Scoring criteria

10 = Outstanding: the response covers all elements of the criterion and associated specified contract requirements and standards; and with a high level of relevant and detailed information, backed up with clear evidence; and demonstrates a robust and coherent understanding of the council’s requirements; and with no issues, weaknesses or omissions.

9 = Excellent: the response covers all elements of the criterion and associated specified contract requirements and standards; and with relevant and detailed information, backed up with clear evidence; but with limited minor issues, weaknesses or omissions only.

8 = Very good: the response covers all key elements and almost all of the other elements of the criterion and associated specified contract requirements and standards; and with relevant and detailed information, backed up with clear evidence; with a few minor issues, weaknesses, or omissions.

7 Good: the response covers all key elements and the majority of the other elements of the criterion and associated specified contract requirements and standards; and with relevant information, backed up with evidence, but lacks detail in some areas; some minor issues, weaknesses, or omissions in some areas.

6 = Better than satisfactory: The response addressees all key elements of the criterion and associated specified contract requirements and standards; but is not fully detailed or fully backed up with clear evidence in some areas; some issues, weaknesses, or omissions in some areas.

5 = Satisfactory: the response addresses all key elements of the criterion and associated specified contract requirements and standards; but is not fully detailed or fully backed up with clear evidence in some areas; with weaknesses, issues or omissions in some areas.

4 = Less than satisfactory: the response has some weaknesses, issues or omissions, lacking detail, clarity and/or evidence regarding at least one key element of the criterion, and associated specified contract requirements and standards with respect to this criterion.

3 = Weak: The response has some weaknesses, issues or omissions, lacking detail, clarity and/or evidence regarding several key elements of the criterion, and associated specified contract requirements and standards.

2 = Poor: The response has material weaknesses, issues or omissions, lacking detail, clarity and/or evidence regarding many key elements of the criterion, and associated specified contract requirements and standards.

1 = Very poor: The response does not meet the criterion or does not include sufficient information or clarity or evidence or information in support, to determine whether the solution meets the council’s requirements or standards.

0 = Unacceptable: Failed to provide a response, or the response provided is wholly inconsistent with the council’s specified contract requirements and standards with respect to this criterion.

Services Agreement assessment score interpretation

Good 10 Confirms no amendment to the agreement is required or makes minor amendment(s) to the Agreement and such amendment(s) does not increase the risk profile for LNER

Acceptable 6 makes amendment(s) to the agreement that do not substantially increase the risk profile for LNER and which retain the substance of the original agreement.

Material reservations 2 makes amendment(s) to the agreement that materially increases the risk profile for LNER while retaining the substance of the original agreement.

Unacceptable 0 makes amendment(s) to the agreement that increases the risk profile for LNER to an unacceptable degree, and/or that alters the substance of the original agreement.

II.2.10)Information about variants
Variants will be accepted: no
II.2.11)Information about options
Options: no
II.2.13)Information about European Union funds
The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds: no
II.2.14)Additional information
II.2)Description
II.2.1)Title:

Lot 2 Clayhills, Aberdeen

Lot No: 2
II.2.2)Additional CPV code(s)
34928480 Waste and rubbish containers and bins
44613800 Containers for waste material
II.2.3)Place of performance
NUTS code: UKM SCOTLAND
II.2.4)Description of the procurement:

LNER invites your submission of a tender to provide waste management services in accordance with the conditions detailed in the attached documents. The waste services contract covers the route of Aberdeen, 1 depot.

The aim of this tender process is to select one or multiple suppliers with whom to sign an agreement for the duration of 4 years with the option to extend for a further year for the provision of the above mentioned services.

II.2.5)Award criteria
Price is not the only award criterion and all criteria are stated only in the procurement documents
II.2.6)Estimated value
Value excluding VAT: 200 000.00 GBP
II.2.7)Duration of the contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system
Start: 04/03/2021
This contract is subject to renewal: yes
Description of renewals:

We are looking to secure a 4-year contract, commencing 4 March 2021 with the option to extend for a further year for the collection and disposal of waste management at our depot.

II.2.9)Information about the limits on the number of candidates to be invited
Envisaged minimum number: 3
Maximum number: 5
Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:

Scoring criteria

10 = Outstanding: the response covers all elements of the criterion and associated specified contract requirements and standards; and with a high level of relevant and detailed information, backed up with clear evidence; and demonstrates a robust and coherent understanding of the council’s requirements; and with no issues, weaknesses or omissions.

9 = Excellent: the response covers all elements of the criterion and associated specified contract requirements and standards; and with relevant and detailed information, backed up with clear evidence; but with limited minor issues, weaknesses or omissions only.

8 = Very good: the response covers all key elements and almost all of the other elements of the criterion and associated specified contract requirements and standards; and with relevant and detailed information, backed up with clear evidence; with a few minor issues, weaknesses, or omissions.

7 = Good: the response covers all key elements and the majority of the other elements of the criterion and associated specified contract requirements and standards; and with relevant information, backed up with evidence, but lacks detail in some areas; some minor issues, weaknesses, or omissions in some areas.

6 = Better than satisfactory: the response addressees all key elements of the criterion and associated specified contract requirements and standards; but is not fully detailed or fully backed up with clear evidence in some areas; some issues, weaknesses, or omissions in some areas.

5 = Satisfactory: the response addresses all key elements of the criterion and associated specified contract requirements and standards; but is not fully detailed or fully backed up with clear evidence in some areas; with weaknesses, issues or omissions in some areas.

4 = Less than satisfactory: the response has some weaknesses, issues or omissions, lacking detail, clarity and/or evidence regarding at least one key element of the criterion, and associated specified contract requirements and standards with respect to this criterion.

3 = Weak: the response has some weaknesses, issues or omissions, lacking detail, clarity and/or evidence regarding several key elements of the criterion, and associated specified contract requirements and standards.

2 = Poor: the response has material weaknesses, issues or omissions, lacking detail, clarity and/or evidence regarding many key elements of the criterion, and associated specified contract requirements and standards.

1 = Very poor: the response does not meet the criterion or does not include sufficient information or clarity or evidence or information in support, to determine whether the solution meets the council’s requirements or standards.

0 = Unacceptable: failed to provide a response, or the response provided is wholly inconsistent with the council’s specified contract requirements and standards with respect to this criterion.

Services agreement assessment score interpretation

Good 10 confirms no amendment to the agreement is required or makes minor amendment(s) to the agreement and such amendment(s) does not increase the risk profile for LNER

Acceptable 6 makes amendment(s) to the agreement that do not substantially increase the risk profile for LNER and which retain the substance of the original agreement.

Material reservations 2 makes amendment(s) to the agreement that materially increases the risk profile for LNER while retaining the substance of the original agreement.

Unacceptable 0 makes amendment(s) to the agreement that increases the risk profile for LNER to an unacceptable degree, and/or that alters the substance of the original agreement.

II.2.10)Information about variants
Variants will be accepted: no
II.2.11)Information about options
Options: no
II.2.13)Information about European Union funds
The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds: no
II.2.14)Additional information
II.2)Description
II.2.1)Title:

Lot 3: Stations, HQ and Aberdeen

Lot No: 3
II.2.2)Additional CPV code(s)
34928480 Waste and rubbish containers and bins
44613800 Containers for waste material
II.2.3)Place of performance
NUTS code: UKC NORTH EAST (ENGLAND)
NUTS code: UKE YORKSHIRE AND THE HUMBER
NUTS code: UKF EAST MIDLANDS (ENGLAND)
NUTS code: UKG WEST MIDLANDS (ENGLAND)
NUTS code: UKH EAST OF ENGLAND
NUTS code: UKI LONDON
NUTS code: UKJ SOUTH EAST (ENGLAND)
NUTS code: UKM SCOTLAND
NUTS code: UKZ EXTRA-REGIO NUTS 1
II.2.4)Description of the procurement:

LNER invites your submission of a tender to provide waste management services in accordance with the conditions detailed in the attached documents. The waste services contract covers the route of Aberdeen, 1 depot.

The aim of this tender process is to select one or multiple suppliers with whom to sign an agreement for the duration of 4 years with the option to extend for a further year for the provision of the above mentioned services.

II.2.5)Award criteria
Price is not the only award criterion and all criteria are stated only in the procurement documents
II.2.6)Estimated value
Value excluding VAT: 920 000.00 GBP
II.2.7)Duration of the contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system
Start: 04/03/2020
This contract is subject to renewal: yes
Description of renewals:

We are looking to secure a 4-year contract, commencing 4 March 2021 with the option to extend for a further year for the collection and disposal of waste management for our stations, HQ and depot.

II.2.9)Information about the limits on the number of candidates to be invited
Envisaged minimum number: 3
Maximum number: 5
Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:

Scoring criteria

10 = Outstanding: the response covers all elements of the criterion and associated specified contract requirements and standards; and with a high level of relevant and detailed information, backed up with clear evidence; and demonstrates a robust and coherent understanding of the council’s requirements; and with no issues, weaknesses or omissions.

9 = Excellent: the response covers all elements of the criterion and associated specified contract requirements and standards; and with relevant and detailed information, backed up with clear evidence; but with limited minor issues, weaknesses or omissions only.

8 = Very good: the response covers all key elements and almost all of the other elements of the criterion and associated specified contract requirements and standards; and with relevant and detailed information, backed up with clear evidence; with a few minor issues, weaknesses, or omissions.

7 = Good: the response covers all key elements and the majority of the other elements of the criterion and associated specified contract requirements and standards; and with relevant information, backed up with evidence, but lacks detail in some areas; some minor issues, weaknesses, or omissions in some areas.

6 = Better than satisfactory: the response addressees all key elements of the criterion and associated specified contract requirements and standards; but is not fully detailed or fully backed up with clear evidence in some areas; some issues, weaknesses, or omissions in some areas.

5 = Satisfactory: the response addresses all key elements of the criterion and associated specified contract requirements and standards; but is not fully detailed or fully backed up with clear evidence in some areas; with weaknesses, issues or omissions in some areas.

4 = Less than satisfactory: the response has some weaknesses, issues or omissions, lacking detail, clarity and/or evidence regarding at least one key element of the criterion, and associated specified contract requirements and standards with respect to this criterion.

3 = Weak: the response has some weaknesses, issues or omissions, lacking detail, clarity and/or evidence regarding several key elements of the criterion, and associated specified contract requirements and standards.

2 = Poor: the response has material weaknesses, issues or omissions, lacking detail, clarity and/or evidence regarding many key elements of the criterion, and associated specified contract requirements and standards.

1 = very poor: The response does not meet the criterion or does not include sufficient information or clarity or evidence or information in support, to determine whether the solution meets the council’s requirements or standards.

0 = Unacceptable: failed to provide a response, or the response provided is wholly inconsistent with the council’s specified contract requirements and standards with respect to this criterion.

Services agreement assessment score interpretation

Good 10 confirms no amendment to the agreement is required or makes minor amendment(s) to the agreement and such amendment(s) does not increase the risk profile for LNER

Acceptable 6 makes amendment(s) to the agreement that do not substantially increase the risk profile for LNER and which retain the substance of the original agreement.

Material reservations 2 makes amendment(s) to the agreement that materially increases the risk profile for LNER while retaining the substance of the original agreement.

Unacceptable 0 makes amendment(s) to the agreement that increases the risk profile for LNER to an unacceptable degree, and/or that alters the substance of the original agreement.

II.2.10)Information about variants
Variants will be accepted: no
II.2.11)Information about options
Options: no
II.2.13)Information about European Union funds
The procurement is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds: no
II.2.14)Additional information

Section IV: Procedure

IV.1)Description
IV.1.1)Type of procedure
Negotiated procedure with prior call for competition
IV.1.3)Information about a framework agreement or a dynamic purchasing system
IV.1.8)Information about the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA)
The procurement is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement: no
IV.2)Administrative information
IV.2.2)Time limit for receipt of tenders or requests to participate
Date: 03/09/2020
Local time: 12:00
IV.2.3)Estimated date of dispatch of invitations to tender or to participate to selected candidates
Date: 06/08/2020
IV.2.4)Languages in which tenders or requests to participate may be submitted:
English
IV.2.6)Minimum time frame during which the tenderer must maintain the tender
Duration in months: 12 (from the date stated for receipt of tender)

Section VI: Complementary information

VI.1)Information about recurrence
This is a recurrent procurement: no
VI.2)Information about electronic workflows
Electronic ordering will be used
Electronic invoicing will be accepted
Electronic payment will be used
VI.3)Additional information:
VI.4)Procedures for review
VI.4.1)Review body
Official name: London North Eastern Railway Ltd
Town: York
Country: United Kingdom
VI.4.2)Body responsible for mediation procedures
Official name: London North Eastern Railway Ltd
Town: York
Country: United Kingdom
VI.4.4)Service from which information about the review procedure may be obtained
Official name: London North Eastern Railway Ltd
Town: York
Country: United Kingdom
VI.5)Date of dispatch of this notice:
11/06/2020