Directive 2004/18/EC
Section I: Contracting authority
I.1)Name, addresses and contact point(s) I.2)Type of the contracting authorityEuropean institution/agency or international organisation
I.3)Main activityOther: Communication networks, content and technology.
I.4)Contract award on behalf of other contracting authoritiesThe contracting authority is purchasing on behalf of other contracting authorities: no
Section II: Object of the contract
II.1)Description
II.1.1)Title attributed to the contract
eHealth action plan 2012–2020: Intermediate evaluation — SMART 2014/0060.
II.1.2)Type of contract and location of works, place of delivery or of performanceServices
Service category No 11: Management consulting services [6] and related services
Main site or location of works, place of delivery or of performance: Contractor's premises.
NUTS code
II.1.3)Information about a framework agreement or a dynamic purchasing system (DPS)
II.1.4)Short description of the contract or purchase(s)
The current study should include the assessment of the progress of the eHAP in every objective by:
1. analysing the added value of having an action plan;
2. providing an overview of the implementation of the eHAP in the first 2–3 years, including a quantitative and qualitative description of the priorities set, the financial mechanisms used (e.g. operating grants, joint actions, tenders, etc.), the beneficiaries reached, the actions funded, and the intended results;
3. assessing the relevance, effectiveness and efficiency of the funded actions, taking into consideration the fact that the majority of the actions funded will not have provided all the deliverables and final reports when the evaluation takes place, so the assessment of impact will have to be forward-looking. However, some preliminary outcome should be analysed, above all related to the data strategy;
4. assessing the impact and adoption of the policy targets.
This assessment should include desk work on the projects and studies supported by the EC, in addition to a survey with representatives of MSs or other key stakeholders about the progress, impact and added value of the actions which have taken place. The study should look for quantitative and objective indicators. Satisfaction surveys should be complementary.
II.1.5)Common procurement vocabulary (CPV)79419000 Evaluation consultancy services
II.1.6)Information about Government Procurement Agreement (GPA)The contract is covered by the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA): yes
II.2)Total final value of contract(s)
II.2.1)Total final value of contract(s)Value: 173 950 EUR
Excluding VAT
Section IV: Procedure
IV.1)Type of procedure
IV.1.1)Type of procedureOpen
IV.2)Award criteria
IV.2.1)Award criteriaThe most economically advantageous tender in terms of
1. Understanding of the tasks required. Weighting 30
2. Technical quality of the offer. Weighting 50
3. Management. Weighting 20
IV.2.2)Information about electronic auctionAn electronic auction has been used: no
IV.3)Administrative information
IV.3.1)File reference number attributed by the contracting authority
SMART 2014-0060.
IV.3.2)Previous publication(s) concerning the same contract Section V: Award of contract
Contract No: 30-CE-0681052/00-90 V.1)Date of contract award decision:5.12.2014
V.2)Information about offersNumber of offers received: 4
V.3)Name and address of economic operator in favour of whom the contract award decision has been takenOfficial name: Deloitte Consulting CVBA
Postal address: Berkenlaan 8b
Town: Diegem
Postal code: 1831
Country: Belgium
V.4)Information on value of contractTotal final value of the contract:
Value: 173 950 EUR
Excluding VAT
V.5)Information about subcontractingThe contract is likely to be sub-contracted: yes
Value or proportion of the contract likely to be sub-contracted to third parties:
Proportion: 26 %
Section VI: Complementary information
VI.1)Information about European Union fundsThe contract is related to a project and/or programme financed by European Union funds: yes
Reference to project(s) and/or programme(s): Horizon 2020 — EU framework programme for research and innovation.
VI.2)Additional information:
VI.3)Procedures for appeal
VI.3.1)Body responsible for appeal procedures VI.3.2)Lodging of appealsPrecise information on deadline(s) for lodging appeals: Within 2 months of the notification to the plaintiff, or in absence thereof, of the day on which it came to the knowledge. A complaint to the European Ombudsman does not have as an effect either to suspend this period or to open a new period for lodging appeals.
VI.3.3)Service from which information about the lodging of appeals may be obtainedOfficial name: European Commission, DG Communications Networks, Content and Technology, Unit H1 — Health and Well-Being, attention: Peteris Zilgalvis, Head of Unit
Postal address: BU31, office 01/066
Town: Brussels
Postal code: 1049
Country: Belgium
E-mail: cnect-h1@ec.europa.eu
Telephone: +32 22969964
Fax: +32 22960181
Internet address: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/connect/index_en.htm
VI.4)Date of dispatch of this notice:23.1.2015