Works - 464756-2017

21/11/2017    S223    - - Works - Contract notice - Restricted procedure 

United Kingdom-Glasgow: Construction work

2017/S 223-464756

Contract notice

Works

Directive 2009/81/EC

Section I: Contracting authority/entity

I.1)Name, addresses and contact point(s)

Ministry of Defence, DIO, Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO)
Room 1.2.24, Kentigern House, 65 Brown Street
For the attention of: Dean Millott
G2 8EX Glasgow
United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 1412248979
E-mail: DIOComrcl-1a3@mod.uk

Internet address(es):

General address of the contracting authority/entity: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ministry-of-defence

Further information can be obtained from: The above mentioned contact point(s)

Specifications and additional documents (including documents for competitive dialogue and a dynamic purchasing system) can be obtained from: The above mentioned contact point(s)

Tenders or requests to participate must be sent to: The above mentioned contact point(s)

I.2)Type of the contracting authority
Ministry or any other national or federal authority, including their regional or local sub-divisions
I.3)Main activity
Defence
I.4)Contract award on behalf of other contracting authorities/entities
The contracting authority is purchasing on behalf of other contracting authorities: no

Section II: Object of the contract

II.1)Description
II.1.1)Title attributed to the contract by the contracting authority:
Secondary Containment Improvement, Senoko, Singapore.
II.1.2)Type of contract and location of works, place of delivery or of performance
Works
Design and execution
Main site or location of works, place of delivery or of performance: Glasgow City.

NUTS code UKM82

II.1.3)Information on framework agreement
II.1.4)Information on framework agreement
II.1.5)Short description of the contract or purchase(s):
Construction work. Designs. The Oil Fuel Depot at Senoko is located at the northern edge of Singapore close to Sembawang Wharf. The value of the works is anticipated to be in the region of 9 000 000 GBP — 11 000 000 GBP. The works are primarily remedial works associated with the secondary containment bunds. The remedial measures include: adding an impermeable barrier to the bunds, increasing the containment volume (by increasing the bund heights with concrete walls) and providing new drainage infrastructure including new pumps. There will also be minor mechanical and electrical works to replace some existing systems which will be affected by the works.
Anticipated skills required:
— Design and construction knowledge of Oil Fuel Depots
— Design and construction of earthworks
— Installation of liner systems
— Design and construction of pumped drainage
— Working with contaminated ground
— Working in an operational site
— Design and installation of electrical and mechanical systems
— Overcoming difficult site access issues
— Knowledge of UK, military and Singaporean regulations.
II.1.6)Common procurement vocabulary (CPV)

45000000 - IA01, 22314000

II.1.7)Information about subcontracting
II.1.8)Lots
This contract is divided into lots: no
II.1.9)Information about variants
Variants will be accepted: no
II.2)Quantity or scope of the contract
II.2.1)Total quantity or scope:
Estimated value excluding VAT:
Range: between 9 000 000 and 11 000 000 GBP
II.2.2)Information about options
Options: no
II.2.3)Information about renewals
II.3)Duration of the contract or time limit for completion

Section III: Legal, economic, financial and technical information

III.1)Conditions relating to the contract
III.1.1)Deposits and guarantees required:
III.1.2)Main financing conditions and payment arrangements and/or reference to the relevant provisions governing them:
III.1.3)Legal form to be taken by the group of economic operators to whom the contract is to be awarded:
III.1.4)Other particular conditions to which the performance of the contract is subject, in particular with regard to security of supply and security of information:
III.1.5)Information about security clearance:
III.2)Conditions for participation
III.2.1)Personal situation

Criteria regarding the personal situation of economic operators (that may lead to their exclusion) including requirements relating to enrolment on professional or trade registers

Information and formalities necessary for evaluating if the requirements are met: The Authority will apply all the offences listed in Article 39(1) of Directive 2009/81/EC (implemented as Regulation 23(1) of the Defence and Security Public Contract Regulations (DSPCR) 2011 in the UK) and all of the professional misconducts listed at Article 39(2) of Directive 2009/81/EC (see also Regulation 23(2) in the DSPCR 2011) to the decision of whether a Candidate is eligible to be invited to tender.

A full list of the Regulation 23(1) and 23(2) criteria are at http://www.contracts.mod.uk/delta/project/reasonsForExclusion.html#dspr

Candidates will be required to sign a declaration confirming whether they do or do not have any of the listed criteria as part of the pre-qualification process.
Candidates who have been convicted of any of the offences under Article 39(1) are ineligible and will not be selected to bid, unless there are overriding requirements in the general interest (including defence and security factors) for doing so.
Candidates who are guilty of any of the offences, circumstances or misconduct under Article 39(2) may be excluded from being selected to bid at the discretion of the Authority.
III.2.2)Economic and financial ability
III.2.3)Technical and/or professional capacity
III.2.4)Information about reserved contracts
III.3)Conditions specific to services contracts
III.3.1)Information about a particular profession
III.3.2)Staff responsible for the execution of the service

Section IV: Procedure

IV.1)Type of procedure
IV.1.1)Type of procedure
Restricted
IV.1.2)Limitations on the number of operators who will be invited to tender or to participate
Envisaged minimum number 3 and maximum number 6
Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates: Criteria covering:
Part 1 — Core Question Modules
— Supplier identity, key roles and contact information
— Financial information
— Health and safety policy and capability
Part 2 — Optional Question Modules
— Equal opportunity and diversity policy and capability
— Environmental management policy and capability
— Quality management policy and capability
Part 3 — DSPCR Core Question Modules
— DSPCR 2011 Part 4 Regulation 23(1) — Mandatory exclusion
— DSPCR 2011 Part 4 Regulation 23(1) — Discretionary exclusion
Part 4 — Supplementary Question Module
— Supplementary / additional questions including in respect of organisational technical and/or professional capability
The above criteria is set out within PQQ PAS 91 which respondents will be asked to complete subsequently in order to potentially down select to the maximum number of companies required to be invited to tender with the Authority.
The questions within the PQQ will be evaluated as either Pass/Fail, Yes/No or a Scored Evaluation:
a. PASS/FAIL Evaluation. A number of PASS/FAIL questions each of which must be passed by the Potential Provider in order to progress (except where the Authority has discretion not to fail the Potential Provider). Where evidence has been requested to support a PASS/FAIL question this should be of an acceptable standard.
b. YES/NO Evaluation. A number of YES/NO questions each of which requires information to be provided by the Potential Provider in order to progress. Where evidence has been requested to support a YES/NO question this should be of an acceptable standard.
c. Scored Evaluation. An assessment through a Scoring methodology, by Subject Matter Experts (SMEs), of the responses and supporting evidence provided by a Potential Provider to each question with a range of criteria. The Authority may require Potential Providers to demonstrate a minimum capability in certain areas.
The evaluation criteria for each question is detailed within Appendix 1 of the PQQ. Potential Providers are to note that where a PASS/FAIL question allows the Authority the discretion to PASS/FAIL, then the Authority will exercise its discretion in determining the exclusion or not of a Potential Provider.
The Authority will score the Potential Provider's response to each question based on its assessment of the evidence provided by the Potential Provider as detailed below.
Award Criteria and Evaluation Methodology
Except where indicated below, the PQQ responses will be allocated a PASS / FAIL mark, YES / NO mark or a Score ranging from 0 to 5 in accordance with the following categories:
Scoring Criteria
Except where indicated below, the PQQ responses will be allocated a PASS / FAIL mark, YES / NO mark or a Score ranging from 0 to 5 in accordance with the following categories:
a. Pass / Fail Question. If a ‘FAIL’ is noted for any questions assessed on a ‘PASS / FAIL’ basis, your inclusion on the Tender List may be precluded, subject to verification by the evaluation team.
b. Yes / No Question. If a ‘NO’ is noted for any questions assessed on a YES / NO basis, your inclusion on the Tender List may not be precluded, however this is subject to verification by the evaluation team.
c. 0 — No Response — Unacceptable or insufficient information provided upon which to make a reasonable assessment. Response fails to provide confidence and demonstrates fundamental misunderstanding of the requirement. Your inclusion on the Tender List may be precluded, dependant on overall score and subject to verification by the evaluation team.
d. 1 — Poor Response — Limited, it lacks detail, credibility and/or explanation, and demonstrates only a basic understanding of the requirement. Partial responses provided, not linked to the key attributes of the questions — anecdotal in parts. The response provides limited evidence of processes, procedures, roles/responsibilities and professional competency etc. The answer contains ambiguities or deficiencies that may not be tolerated. Your inclusion on the Tender List will most likely be precluded, dependant on overall score and subject to verification by the evaluation team.
e. 2 — Satisfactory Response — demonstrates a satisfactory understanding of the requirement. The response outlines a level of professional competency. Response includes some key processes and procedures, linked to key attributes of the questions and demonstrates a reasonably acceptable approach that covers most areas, however, lacks depth and supporting evidence. Your inclusion on the Tender List may not be precluded; however this is subject to verification by the evaluation team.
f. 3 — Good Response — is sufficiently detailed to demonstrate a good understanding of the requirement. Demonstrable approach that is clear and consistent. Processes and procedures are reasonably well explained and logical. Response is clear, verifiable and covers all key attributes of the question. Your inclusion on the Tender List may not be precluded; however this is subject to verification by the evaluation team.
g. 4 — Very Good Response — demonstrates a strong understanding of the requirement. It provides specific details and clearly demonstrates professional competencies and works experience in relation to the question. Evidence provided to support a confidence in ability to deliver. The response identifies specific commendations/awards achieved in relation to the question being answered, that can be verified by the evaluation team.
h. 5 — Excellent Response — is comprehensive, unambiguous and demonstrates an excellent understanding of the requirement. Approach is detailed and includes robust and effective measures, with processes and procedures being clearly explained and perfectly logical. It provides specific details and clearly demonstrates professional competencies and relevant works experience in relation to the question. Clear and fully verifiable evidence provided that covers all attributes, providing high degree of confidence in ability to deliver. The response identifies specific commendations/awards achieved in relation to the question being answered, that can be verified by the evaluation team.
IV.1.3)Reduction of the number of operators during the negotiation or dialogue
IV.2)Award criteria
IV.2.1)Award criteria
The most economically advantageous tender in terms of the criteria stated in the specifications, in the invitation to tender or to negotiate or in the descriptive document
IV.2.2)Information about electronic auction
An electronic auction has been used: no
IV.3)Administrative information
IV.3.1)File reference number attributed by the contracting authority:
DIOCB1/024
IV.3.2)Previous publication(s) concerning the same contract

Prior information notice

Notice number in the OJEU: 2017/S 088-173089 of 6.5.2017

IV.3.3)Conditions for obtaining specifications and additional documents or descriptive document
IV.3.4)Time limit for receipt of tenders or requests to participate
22.12.2017 - 18:00
IV.3.5)Date of dispatch of invitations to tender or to participate to selected candidates
19.3.2018
IV.3.6)Language(s) in which tenders or requests to participate may be drawn up
English.

Section VI: Complementary information

VI.1)Information about recurrence
VI.2)Information about European Union funds
VI.3)Additional information:
The Authority reserves the right to amend any condition related to security of information to reflect any changes in national law or government policy. If any contract documents are accompanied by instructions on safeguarding classified information (e.g. a Security Aspects Letter), the Authority reserves the right to amend the terms of these instructions to reflect any changes in national law or government policy, whether in respect of the applicable protective marking scheme, specific protective markings given, the aspects to which any protective marking applies, or otherwise. The link below to the Gov.uk website provides information on the Government Security Classification.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-security-classifications

Advertising Regime OJEU:- This contract opportunity is published in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU),the MoD Defence Contracts Bulletin and www.contracts.mod.uk

Please note that for the avoidance of any doubt this requirement will be undertaken in Singapore. GO Reference: GO-20171117-DCB-11412663.
VI.4)Procedures for appeal
VI.4.1)Body responsible for appeal procedures

Ministry of Defence, DIO, Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO)
DIO Commercial, Kentigern House, 65 Brown Street
G2 8EX Glasgow
United Kingdom
Telephone: +44 1412248979

Body responsible for mediation procedures

Ministry of Defence, DIO, Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO)
Glasgow
United Kingdom

VI.4.2)Lodging of appeals
VI.4.3)Service from which information about the lodging of appeals may be obtained

Ministry of Defence, DIO, Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO)
Glasgow
United Kingdom

VI.5)Date of dispatch of this notice:
17.11.2017