Works - 75630-2018

20/02/2018    S35    - - Works - Additional information - Restricted procedure 

United Kingdom-Birmingham: Construction work

2018/S 035-075630

Corrigendum

Notice for changes or additional information

Works

(Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, 2018/S 010-017461)

Legal Basis:

Section I: Contracting authority/entity

I.1)Name and addresses
Highways England
The Cube, 199 Wharfside Street
Birmingham
B1 1RN
United Kingdom
E-mail: dipprocurement@highwaysengland.co.uk
NUTS code: UK

Internet address(es):

Main address: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/highways-england

Address of the buyer profile: https://highways.bravosolution.co.uk/web/login.shtml

Section II: Object

II.1)Scope of the procurement
II.1.1)Title:

Delivery Integration Partners (DIP)

II.1.2)Main CPV code
45000000
II.1.3)Type of contract
Works
II.1.4)Short description:

To support delivery of the UK Road Investment Strategy (RIS1 & RIS2 https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/road-investment-strategy), DIPs will design and construct highway projects across England under NEC4 standard terms, with suitable amendments. The term will be from 2018 to 2024.

The framework will be divided into 8 lots, with each lot having a specific value threshold for work packages and covering a defined geographical area. Lots 1 to 3 (Band A) are for work packages not exceeding 100 000 000 GBP, lots 4 to 8 (Band B) are for work packages exceeding 100 000 000 GBP. Candidates who apply in lots 1 to 3, will not be permitted to also apply in lots 4 to 8.

Successful DIPs will be guaranteed an initial package of work under each lot with subsequent contracts being allocated either on a direct award basis or under mini-competition which may include the suppliers appointed to all lots. The procurement documents will provide more detail on how work will be allocated.

Section VI: Complementary information

VI.5)Date of dispatch of this notice:
16/02/2018
VI.6)Original notice reference
Notice number in the OJ S: 2018/S 010-017461

Section VII: Changes

VII.1)Information to be changed or added
VII.1.2)Text to be corrected in the original notice
Section number: II.2.9)
Lot No: 1
Place of text to be modified: Maximum number:
Instead of:
Read:

10

Section number: II.2.9)
Lot No: 2
Place of text to be modified: Maximum number:
Instead of:

7

Read:

10

Section number: II.2.9)
Lot No: 3
Place of text to be modified: Maximum number:
Instead of:

7

Read:

10

Section number: II.2.9)
Lot No: 4
Place of text to be modified: Maximum number:
Instead of:

8

Read:

10

Section number: II.2.9)
Lot No: 5
Place of text to be modified: Maximum number:
Instead of:

8

Read:

10

Section number: II.2.9)
Lot No: 6
Place of text to be modified: Maximum number:
Instead of:

8

Read:

10

Section number: II.2.9)
Lot No: 7
Place of text to be modified: Maximum number:
Instead of:

8

Read:

10

Section number: II.2.9)
Lot No: 8
Place of text to be modified: Maximum number:
Instead of:

8

Read:

10

Section number: II.2.9)
Lot No: 1
Place of text to be modified: Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:
Instead of:

— evaluation criteria for the questions are provided in the procurement documents,

— the 7 highest scoring candidates who have expressed an interest in the lot will be invited to tender simultaneously for the lot and one of the initial packages,

— where the last candidate to be invited to the lot shares the same score as the 8th candidate, none of the candidates who share that score will be invited,

— except, if applying this rule would cause fewer than 5 candidates to be invited to the lot, HE may, at its discretion, invite all candidates who share a score with the 7th candidate and exceed the anticipated maximum number of candidates.

Read:

— evaluation criteria for the questions are provided in the procurement documents,

— the 10 highest scoring candidates who have expressed an interest in the lot will be invited to tender simultaneously for the lot and one of the initial packages,

— where the last candidate to be invited to the lot shares the same score as the 11th candidate, none of the candidates who share that score will be invited,

— except, if applying this rule would cause fewer than 5 candidates to be invited to the lot, HE may, at its discretion, invite all candidates who share a score with the 10th candidate and exceed the anticipated maximum number of candidates.

Section number: II.2.9)
Lot No: 2
Place of text to be modified: Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:
Instead of:

— evaluation criteria for the questions are provided in the procurement documents,

— the 7 highest scoring candidates who have expressed an interest in the lot will be invited to tender simultaneously for the lot and one of the initial packages,

— where the last candidate to be invited to the lot shares the same score as the 8th candidate, none of the candidates who share that score will be invited,

— except, if applying this rule would cause fewer than 5 candidates to be invited to the lot, HE may, at its discretion, invite all candidates who share a score with the 7th candidate and exceed the anticipated maximum number of candidates.

Read:

— evaluation criteria for the questions are provided in the procurement documents,

— the 10 highest scoring candidates who have expressed an interest in the lot will be invited to tender simultaneously for the lot and one of the initial packages,

— where the last candidate to be invited to the lot shares the same score as the 11th candidate, none of the candidates who share that score will be invited,

— except, if applying this rule would cause fewer than 5 candidates to be invited to the lot, HE may, at its discretion, invite all candidates who share a score with the 10th candidate and exceed the anticipated maximum number of candidates.

Section number: II.2.9)
Lot No: 3
Place of text to be modified: Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:
Instead of:

— evaluation criteria for the questions are provided in the procurement documents,

— the 7 highest scoring candidates who have expressed an interest in the lot will be invited to tender simultaneously for the lot and one of the initial packages,

— where the last candidate to be invited to the lot shares the same score as the 8th candidate, none of the candidates who share that score will be invited,

— except, if applying this rule would cause fewer than 5 candidates to be invited to the lot, HE may, at its discretion, invite all candidates who share a score with the 7th candidate and exceed the anticipated maximum number of candidates.

Read:

— evaluation criteria for the questions are provided in the procurement documents,

— the 10 highest scoring candidates who have expressed an interest in the lot will be invited to tender simultaneously for the lot and one of the initial packages,

— where the last candidate to be invited to the lot shares the same score as the 11th candidate, none of the candidates who share that score will be invited,

— except, if applying this rule would cause fewer than 5 candidates to be invited to the lot, HE may, at its discretion, invite all candidates who share a score with the 10th candidate and exceed the anticipated maximum number of candidates.

Section number: II.2.9)
Lot No: 4
Place of text to be modified: Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:
Instead of:

— evaluation criteria for the questions are provided in the procurement documents,

— the 8 highest scoring candidates who have expressed an interest in the lot will be invited to tender simultaneously for the lot and one of the initial packages,

— where the last candidate to be invited to the lot shares the same score as the 9th candidate, none of the candidates who share that score will be invited,

— except, if applying this rule would cause fewer than 5 candidates to be invited to the lot, HE may, at its discretion, invite all candidates who share a score with the 8th candidate and exceed the anticipated maximum number of candidates.

Read:

— evaluation criteria for the questions are provided in the procurement documents,

— the 10 highest scoring candidates who have expressed an interest in the lot will be invited to tender simultaneously for the lot and one of the initial packages,

— where the last candidate to be invited to the lot shares the same score as the 11th candidate, none of the candidates who share that score will be invited,

— except, if applying this rule would cause fewer than 5 candidates to be invited to the lot, HE may, at its discretion, invite all candidates who share a score with the 10th candidate and exceed the anticipated maximum number of candidates.

Section number: II.2.9)
Lot No: 5
Place of text to be modified: Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:
Instead of:

— evaluation criteria for the questions are provided in the procurement documents,

— the 8 highest scoring candidates who have expressed an interest in the lot will be invited to tender simultaneously for the lot and one of the initial packages,

— where the last candidate to be invited to the lot shares the same score as the 9th candidate, none of the candidates who share that score will be invited,

— except, if applying this rule would cause fewer than 5 candidates to be invited to the lot, HE may, at its discretion, invite all candidates who share a score with the 8th candidate and exceed the anticipated maximum number of candidates.

Read:

— evaluation criteria for the questions are provided in the procurement documents,

— the 10 highest scoring candidates who have expressed an interest in the lot will be invited to tender simultaneously for the lot and one of the initial packages,

— where the last candidate to be invited to the lot shares the same score as the 11th candidate, none of the candidates who share that score will be invited,

— except, if applying this rule would cause fewer than 5 candidates to be invited to the lot, HE may, at its discretion, invite all candidates who share a score with the 10th candidate and exceed the anticipated maximum number of candidates.

Section number: II.2.9)
Lot No: 6
Place of text to be modified: Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:
Instead of:

— evaluation criteria for the questions are provided in the procurement documents,

— the 8 highest scoring candidates who have expressed an interest in the lot will be invited to tender simultaneously for the lot and one of the initial packages,

— where the last candidate to be invited to the lot shares the same score as the 9th candidate, none of the candidates who share that score will be invited,

— except, if applying this rule would cause fewer than 5 candidates to be invited to the lot, HE may, at its discretion, invite all candidates who share a score with the 8th candidate and exceed the anticipated maximum number of candidates.

Read:

— evaluation criteria for the questions are provided in the procurement documents,

— the 10 highest scoring candidates who have expressed an interest in the lot will be invited to tender simultaneously for the lot and one of the initial packages,

— where the last candidate to be invited to the lot shares the same score as the 11th candidate, none of the candidates who share that score will be invited,

— except, if applying this rule would cause fewer than 5 candidates to be invited to the lot, HE may, at its discretion, invite all candidates who share a score with the 10th candidate and exceed the anticipated maximum number of candidates.

Section number: II.2.9)
Lot No: 7
Place of text to be modified: Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:
Instead of:

— evaluation criteria for the questions are provided in the procurement documents,

— the 8 highest scoring candidates who have expressed an interest in the lot will be invited to tender simultaneously for the lot and one of the initial packages,

— where the last candidate to be invited to the lot shares the same score as the 9th candidate, none of the candidates who share that score will be invited,

— except, if applying this rule would cause fewer than 6 candidates to be invited to the lot, HE may, at its discretion, invite all candidates who share a score with the 8th candidate and exceed the anticipated maximum number of candidates.

Read:

— evaluation criteria for the questions are provided in the procurement documents,

— the 10 highest scoring candidates who have expressed an interest in the lot will be invited to tender simultaneously for the lot and one of the initial packages,

— where the last candidate to be invited to the lot shares the same score as the 11th candidate, none of the candidates who share that score will be invited,

— except, if applying this rule would cause fewer than 6 candidates to be invited to the lot, HE may, at its discretion, invite all candidates who share a score with the 10th candidate and exceed the anticipated maximum number of candidates.

Section number: II.2.9)
Lot No: 8
Place of text to be modified: Objective criteria for choosing the limited number of candidates:
Instead of:

— evaluation criteria for the questions are provided in the procurement documents,

— the 8 highest scoring candidates who have expressed an interest in the lot will be invited to tender simultaneously for the lot and one of the initial packages,

— where the last candidate to be invited to the lot shares the same score as the 9th candidate, none of the candidates who share that score will be invited,

— except, if applying this rule would cause fewer than 6 candidates to be invited to the lot, HE may, at its discretion, invite all candidates who share a score with the 8th candidate and exceed the anticipated maximum number of candidates.

Read:

— evaluation criteria for the questions are provided in the procurement documents,

— the 10 highest scoring candidates who have expressed an interest in the lot will be invited to tender simultaneously for the lot and one of the initial packages,

— where the last candidate to be invited to the lot shares the same score as the 11th candidate, none of the candidates who share that score will be invited,

— except, if applying this rule would cause fewer than 6 candidates to be invited to the lot, HE may, at its discretion, invite all candidates who share a score with the 10th candidate and exceed the anticipated maximum number of candidates.

Section number: IV.2.2)
Place of text to be modified: IV.2.2)
Instead of:
Date: 16/02/2018
Local time: 13:00
Read:
Date: 23/02/2018
Local time: 13:00
VII.2)Other additional information: