2.1.6.
Izslēgšanas iemesli
Līdzīga situācija kā bankrots saskaņā ar valsts tiesību aktiem: Is the supplier in a situation where he has been granted compulsory debt settlement? Explain why, in those circumstances, it is nevertheless possible to perform the contract, taking into account the applicable national rules and measures relating to the continuation of business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if the rejection of suppliers is made mandatory under applicable national law without the possibility of exceptions.
Bankrots: Is the supplier in a bankruptcy situation? Explain why, in those circumstances, it is nevertheless possible to perform the contract, taking into account the applicable national rules and measures relating to the continuation of business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if the rejection of suppliers is made mandatory under applicable national law without the possibility of exceptions.
Korupcija: Has the supplier itself or a person, who is a member of the supplier's administrative, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, been convicted of corruption by a judgment handed down not more than five years ago, or a period of rejection stipulated directly in the judgment that is still in force? Corruption as defined in Article 3 of the Convention on combating corruption, involving officials of the European Communities or of Member States of the European Union (OJ C 195, 25.6.1997, p. 1), and in Article 2(1) of Council Framework Decision 2003/568/JHA of 22 July 2003 on combating corruption in the private sector (OJ L 192, 31.7.2003, p. 54). This ground for rejection also includes corruption as defined in national law for the contracting authority or supplier.
Vienošanās ar kreditoriem: Is the supplier in a situation where he has been granted compulsory debt settlement? Explain why, in those circumstances, it is nevertheless possible to perform the contract, taking into account the applicable national rules and measures relating to the continuation of business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if the rejection of suppliers is made mandatory under applicable national law without the possibility of exceptions.
Dalība noziedzīgā organizācijā: Has the supplier itself or a person, who is a member of the supplier's administrative, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, been convicted of participation in a criminal organisation by a judgment handed down not more than five years ago, or a period of rejection stipulated directly in the judgment that is still in force? Participation in a criminal organisation as defined in Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2008/841/JHA of 24 October 2008 on combating organised crime (OJ L 300, 11.11.2008, p. 42)
Nolīgumi ar citiem ekonomikas dalībniekiem, kuru mērķis ir izkropļot konkurenci: Has the supplier entered into agreement(s) with other suppliers with the intention of distorting competition?
Pienākumu neizpilde vides tiesību jomā: Is the supplier aware of having committed a breach of environmental provisions as set out in national law, the relevant announcement or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
Nelikumīgi iegūtu līdzekļu legalizēšana vai teroristu finansēšana: Has the supplier itself or a person, who is a member of the supplier's administrative, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, been convicted by a final judgment of money laundering or terrorist financing by a judgment handed down not more than five years ago, or a period of rejection stipulated directly in the judgment that is still in force? Money laundering or terrorist financingAs defined in Article 1 of Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering and terrorist financing (OJ L 309, 25.11.2005, p. 15).
Krāpšana: Has the supplier itself or a person, who is a member of the supplier's administrative, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, been convicted of fraud by a judgment handed down not more than five years ago, or a rejection period stipulated directly in the judgment that is still in force? Fraud within the meaning of Article 1 of the Convention on the Protection of the European Communities' Financial Interests (OJ C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 48).
Bērnu darbs un citi cilvēku tirdzniecības veidi: Has the supplier itself or a person, who is a member of the supplier's administrative, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, been convicted of child labour and other forms of human trafficking by a judgment handed down not more than five years ago, or a period of rejection stipulated directly in the judgment that is still in force? Child labour and other forms of trafficking in human beings as defined in Article 2 of Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA (OJ L 101, 15.4.2011, p. 1).
Maksātnespēja: Is the supplier in an insolvency situation? Explain why, in those circumstances, it is nevertheless possible to perform the contract, taking into account the applicable national rules and measures relating to the continuation of business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if the rejection of suppliers is made mandatory under applicable national law without the possibility of exceptions.
Pienākumu neizpilde darba tiesību jomā: Is the supplier aware of having committed a breach of employment conditions provisions as set out in national law, the relevant announcement or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
Aktīvi, kurus pārvalda likvidators: Explain why, in those circumstances, it is nevertheless possible to perform the contract, taking into account the applicable national rules and measures relating to the continuation of business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if the rejection of suppliers is made mandatory under applicable national law without the possibility of exceptions.
Kļūdaina nepatiesas informācijas sniegšana, nespēja sniegt pieprasītos dokumentus un iegūta konfidenciāla informācija šajā procedūrā: Has the contractor: a) provided grossly incorrect information when providing the information required to verify that there are no grounds for rejection or that the qualification requirements have been met, b) failed to provide such information, c) made a reservation to immediately provide the supporting documents requested by the contracting authority, or d) unduly influenced the contracting authority's decision-making process in order to acquire confidential information that may give it an unfair advantage in connection with competition, or has negligently provided misleading information that may have a significant influence on decisions on rejection, selection or award?
Interešu konflikts saistībā ar tās dalību iepirkuma procedūrā: Is the supplier aware of a conflict of interest as set out in national law, the relevant announcement or the procurement documents?
Tieša vai netieša iesaistīšanās šīs iepirkuma procedūras sagatavošanā;: Has the supplier or a company associated with the supplier advised the contracting authority or otherwise been involved in the planning of the competition?
Vainīgs smagā pārkāpumā saistībā ar profesionālo darbību: Has the supplier committed serious errors in the practice of their profession? If applicable, refer to definitions in national law, the relevant announcement or the procurement documents.
Pirmstermiņa izbeigšana, zaudējumu atlīdzināšana vai citas līdzīgas sankcijas: Has the supplier committed a material breach of contract in connection with the performance of a previous public contract, a previous contract with a public contracting authority or a previous concession contract, where the breach has led to termination of the contract, damages or other similar sanctions?
Pienākumu neizpilde sociālo tiesību jomā: Is the supplier aware of having committed a breach of social conditions provisions as set out in national law, the relevant announcement or procurement documents or Article 18 (2) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
Sociālās apdrošināšanas iemaksu veikšana: Has the supplier failed to fulfil all its obligations to pay social security contributions both in the country in which it is established and in the contracting authority's Member State, if this is a country other than the one in which it is established?
Uzņēmējdarbību aptur: Explain why, in those circumstances, it is nevertheless possible to perform the contract, taking into account the applicable national rules and measures relating to the continuation of business activities? It is not necessary to provide this information if the rejection of suppliers is made mandatory under applicable national law without the possibility of exceptions.
Nodokļu maksāšana: Has the contractor failed to fulfil its obligations to pay taxes and duties in the country in which it is established and in the contracting authority's Member State, if this is a country other than the one in which it is established?
Teroristu nodarījumi vai nodarījumi, kas saistīti ar teroristu darbībām: Has the supplier itself or a person who is a member of the supplier's administrative, management or supervisory body or has the competence to represent or control or make decisions in such bodies, been convicted of terrorist offences or criminal offences related to terrorist activity by a judgment handed down not more than five years ago, or a period of rejection stipulated directly in the judgment that is still in force? Terrorist offences or criminal offences related to terrorist activity as defined in Articles 1 and 3 of Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism (OJ L 164, 22.6.2002, p. 3). That ground of inadmissibility also includes incitement, aiding or abetting the commission of acts within the meaning of Article 4 of that Framework Decision.
